Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Bug]: Can't send eth and show replacement transaction underpriced #14365

Open
bapex opened this issue Apr 5, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

[Bug]: Can't send eth and show replacement transaction underpriced #14365

bapex opened this issue Apr 5, 2022 · 1 comment
Labels
area-nonce Relating to tx nonce logic

Comments

@bapex
Copy link

bapex commented Apr 5, 2022

Describe the bug

My transaction is still pending.
So I tried to send my eth to my address with using custom nonce.
But It shows failed immediately.
I tried account reset and reinstall metamask extension, but it looks same.
I asked support but they didn't know how to solve this problem.
If you have any solutions, please let me know.

スクリーンショット 2022-04-06 3 44 58

スクリーンショット 2022-04-06 3 35 09

Steps to reproduce

  1. Send eth to same account
  2. Show failed
  3. Resend eth

Error messages or log output

[ethjs-query] while formatting outputs from RPC '{"value":{"code":-32000,"message":"replacement transaction underpriced"}}'

Version

10.12.2

Build type

No response

Browser

Chrome

Operating system

MacOS

Hardware wallet

No response

Additional context

No response

@kevinghim
Copy link
Contributor

Should be fixed via #14355

brad-decker added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 26, 2023
## **Description**
Our fork of ethjs-query has been namespaced to the `@metamask/`
namespace, and updated with mostly development only fixes. There is one
exception which is the reason for this pull request which is the removal
of a try/catch that was catching too broadly and wrapping legitimate
errors in a new Error object that claimed the issue was with the
formatting of the output. In most cases this is incorrect and results in
a wide swath of errors being lumped together inside of sentry. This
change will result in the real errors being surfaced, after which we can
decide where to prioritize efforts to resolve RPC issues.

This PR progresses, and is expected to change the stack trace for the
following issues:
#9317 
#10519 
#10619
#11488 
#11974 
#13395 
#14298 
#14365 
#15250 
#17073 
#17803 
#19697 
#20699 

We are closing these issues opened automatically by sentry-io which are
not fully resolved but should result in better errors and stack traces:

fixes #10552 
fixes #14660 
fixes #14676 
fixes #14730 
fixes #14801
fixes #15065 

## **Manual testing steps**
1. Attempt to reproduce any of the bugs listed, 17073 was the easiest to
reproduce for me. This involves getting test currency from the wemix
faucet as listed in the issue and initiating a transaction between two
accounts you own.
2. On develop you'll see an 'error formatting outputs' error text
similar to what is reported in the issue.
3. On this branch you'll get the original error, without the wrapped
'formatting' error. including a different stack trace.

## **Pre-merge author checklist**

- [x] I’ve followed [MetaMask Coding
Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-extension/blob/develop/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md).
- [x] I've clearly explained:
  - [x] What problem this PR is solving.
  - [x] How this problem was solved.
  - [x] How reviewers can test my changes.
- [x] I’ve indicated what issue this PR is linked to: Fixes #???
- [x] I’ve included tests if applicable.
- [x] I’ve documented any added code.
- [x] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling
guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-extension/blob/develop/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)).
- [x] I’ve properly set the pull request status:
  - [ ] In case it's not yet "ready for review", I've set it to "draft".
- [x] In case it's "ready for review", I've changed it from "draft" to
"non-draft".

## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist**

- [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the
app, test code being changed).
- [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described
in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such
as recordings and or screenshots.

---------

Co-authored-by: MetaMask Bot <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area-nonce Relating to tx nonce logic
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants