Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Worker deployments should have resource requests and limits #20163

Closed
carbonin opened this issue May 12, 2020 · 0 comments · Fixed by #20193
Closed

Worker deployments should have resource requests and limits #20163

carbonin opened this issue May 12, 2020 · 0 comments · Fixed by #20193

Comments

@carbonin
Copy link
Member

These should be based on the worker settings that the server normally monitors when we're running in an appliance.

carbonin added a commit to carbonin/manageiq that referenced this issue May 20, 2020
This is based on the worker's memory_threshold setting

Fixes ManageIQ#20163
carbonin added a commit to carbonin/manageiq that referenced this issue Jun 1, 2020
This is based on the worker's memory_threshold setting

Fixes ManageIQ#20163
carbonin added a commit to carbonin/manageiq that referenced this issue Jun 3, 2020
This setting will be set by the orchestrator startup process
which is in turn driven by a parameter in the CR.

The default for this is false in the operator so will also be false
in the settings.

Fixes ManageIQ#20163
carbonin added a commit to carbonin/manageiq that referenced this issue Jul 2, 2020
This is based on the worker's memory_threshold setting

Fixes ManageIQ#20163
carbonin added a commit to carbonin/manageiq that referenced this issue Jul 2, 2020
This setting will be set by the orchestrator startup process
which is in turn driven by a parameter in the CR.

The default for this is false in the operator so will also be false
in the settings.

Fixes ManageIQ#20163
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant