-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 356
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Display all of the following, not just Foreman #6730
Conversation
bdunne
commented
Mar 4, 2020
- ConfigurationManager
- ConfiguredSystem
- ConfigurationProfile
@miq-bot assign @h-kataria |
Not sure if we want to merge this in this state or if it needs more discussion. |
@h-kataria It's not clear to me how to fix the remaining spec failure. |
- ConfigurationManager - ConfiguredSystem - ConfigurationProfile
Checked commit bdunne@c5a59a4 with ruby 2.5.7, rubocop 0.69.0, haml-lint 0.20.0, and yamllint |
merging this PR, need to create a follow up PR to rename all the file names to not be specific to foreman. |
Thanks for the help on this one @h-kataria |
Renamed provider_foreman specific features, links etc to configuration_manager Follow up PR for ManageIQ/manageiq-ui-classic#6730
- Renamed views, controllers and other files to not be specific to provider_foreman - Renamed methods and actions, routes etc to use `configuration_manager` - Changed any links to point to `configuration_manager` instead of `provider_foreman` follow up PR for ManageIQ#6730
- Renamed views, controllers and other files to not be specific to provider_foreman - Renamed methods and actions, routes etc to use `configuration_manager` - Changed any links to point to `configuration_manager` instead of `provider_foreman` follow up PR for ManageIQ#6730
Classification.bulk_reassignment(:model => "ConfiguredSystem", | ||
:object_ids => @configured_system.id, | ||
Classification.bulk_reassignment(:model => "ManageIQ::Providers::Foreman::ConfigurationManager", | ||
:object_ids => @config_mgr.id, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@bdunne Did this one go backwards?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@h-kataria helped to get this test passing.
it's due to the fact that we removed match_via_descendants from tree building code it wasnt getting the correctly tagged object back
Renamed provider_foreman specific features, links etc to configuration_manager Follow up PR for ManageIQ/manageiq-ui-classic#6730
Renamed provider_foreman specific features, links etc to configuration_manager Follow up PR for ManageIQ/manageiq-ui-classic#6730
Renamed provider_foreman specific features, links etc to configuration_manager Follow up PR for ManageIQ/manageiq-ui-classic#6730
Display all of the following, not just Foreman (cherry picked from commit 9e5201a)
Jansa backport details:
|