Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactoring update_serviceprovision_status method #19

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 27, 2017
Merged

Refactoring update_serviceprovision_status method #19

merged 4 commits into from
Jan 27, 2017

Conversation

pkomanek
Copy link
Contributor

@pkomanek pkomanek commented Jan 13, 2017

Purpose or Intent

Refactoring the update_serviceprovision_status methods and specs. This PR is based on the issue bellow.

Links [Optional]

#8

@pkomanek
Copy link
Contributor Author

@miq-bot add_labels automate, enhancement, refactoring, wip

@miq-bot
Copy link
Member

miq-bot commented Jan 13, 2017

@pkomanek Cannot apply the following labels because they are not recognized: automate, refactoring, wip

@miq-bot
Copy link
Member

miq-bot commented Jan 19, 2017

Checked commits pkomanek/manageiq-content@573e16a~...236a9df with ruby 2.2.6, rubocop 0.46.0, and haml-lint 0.19.0
6 files checked, 1 offense detected

content/automate/ManageIQ/Service/Provisioning/StateMachines/ServiceProvision_Template.class/methods/update_serviceprovision_status.rb

@pkomanek pkomanek changed the title [WIP] Refactoring update_serviceprovision_status method Refactoring update_serviceprovision_status method Jan 19, 2017
module Service
module Provisioning
module StateMachines
module ServiceProvision_Template
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@pkomanek can this be module ServiceProvisionTemplate?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@pkomanek I am not sure if thats because of an internal naming issue. We might have to leave it as ServiceProvision_Template. @tinaafitz can you comment on this.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@mkanoor @pkomanek It is an internal naming issue, so we have to leave the name as ServiceProvision_Template.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@mkanoor mkanoor merged commit 6d2f13a into ManageIQ:master Jan 27, 2017
@pkomanek pkomanek deleted the refactoring_update_serviceprovision_status branch January 31, 2017 11:55
@mkanoor mkanoor added this to the Sprint 54 Ending Feb 13, 2017 milestone Feb 3, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants