Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[LASKER] ems_automation_add_provider was from a refactoring on master, not lasker #1055

Conversation

jrafanie
Copy link
Member

#1033 was fine on master but relied
on a refactoring/rewording of product features and models in ManageIQ/manageiq#21108
and this refactoring did not get backported to lasker.

In other words, ems_automation_add_provider doesn't exist in lasker, but
automation_manager_add_provider does, so we'll use that.

cc @agrare

ManageIQ#1033 was fine on master but relied
on a refactoring/rewording of product features and models in ManageIQ/manageiq#21108
and this refactoring did not get backported to lasker.

In other words, ems_automation_add_provider doesn't exist in lasker, but
automation_manager_add_provider does, so we'll use that.
@jrafanie jrafanie requested a review from bdunne as a code owner July 12, 2021 17:07
@Fryguy Fryguy self-assigned this Jul 12, 2021
@Fryguy Fryguy added the bug label Jul 12, 2021
Copy link
Member

@agrare agrare left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 good catch, didn't realize ems_automation_add_provider was changed recently

@miq-bot
Copy link
Member

miq-bot commented Jul 12, 2021

Checked commit jrafanie@8dc1ca1 with ruby 2.6.3, rubocop 1.13.0, haml-lint 0.35.0, and yamllint
0 files checked, 0 offenses detected
Everything looks fine. 👍

@Fryguy Fryguy merged commit 03d1d7c into ManageIQ:lasker Jul 12, 2021
@jrafanie
Copy link
Member Author

👍 good catch, didn't realize ems_automation_add_provider was changed recently

Yeah, I only knew because I was looking at all of these bogus product features that the UI was doing and silently wrongly failing feature checks for non-admin users. Normally, it would make sense to backport simple product feature renames but since these reflected code changes in model names, I think we correctly chose not to backport it.

@jrafanie jrafanie deleted the ems_automation_add_provider_is_invalid_on_lasker branch July 12, 2021 17:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants