You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
From: Winston, Richard [email protected]
Date: Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 7:32 PM
Subject: more issues with MODFLOW-6 input descriptions
To: Christian D Langevin [email protected]
In the description of condeqn in MAW, the description of "MEAN" has "using using" instead of just "using".
In the description of condeqn in MAW, the description of "MEAN" says that the "aquifer and screen hydraulic conductivity" are used in calculating the conductance. After looking at T&M-55 and the source code, I think only the screen hydraulic conductivity is used.
In the description of condeqn in MAW, the description of "SKIN" says that the "screen hydraulic conductivity" is used. After looking at T&M-55 and the source code, I think both the aquifer and screen hydraulic conductivity are used in calculating the conductance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
From: Winston, Richard [email protected]
Date: Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 7:32 PM
Subject: more issues with MODFLOW-6 input descriptions
To: Christian D Langevin [email protected]
In the description of condeqn in MAW, the description of "MEAN" has "using using" instead of just "using".
In the description of condeqn in MAW, the description of "MEAN" says that the "aquifer and screen hydraulic conductivity" are used in calculating the conductance. After looking at T&M-55 and the source code, I think only the screen hydraulic conductivity is used.
In the description of condeqn in MAW, the description of "SKIN" says that the "screen hydraulic conductivity" is used. After looking at T&M-55 and the source code, I think both the aquifer and screen hydraulic conductivity are used in calculating the conductance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: