forked from vercel/next.js
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[pull] canary from vercel:canary #549
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
As discussed [here](https://vercel.slack.com/archives/C035J346QQL/p1668425692084449), we don't need the timestamp for CSS resources in the app dir for now as we are not preloading them. Manually tested with Safari and added corresponding e2e tests. Closes #42862. ## Bug - [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number` - [x] Integration tests added - [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md` ## Feature - [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. - [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number` - [ ] Integration tests added - [ ] Documentation added - [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not. - [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md` ## Documentation / Examples - [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint` - [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
It's is confusing for the first time readers and probably wrong! ## Bug - [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number` - [ ] Integration tests added - [x] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md` ## Feature - [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. - [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number` - [ ] Integration tests added - [x] Documentation added - [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not. - [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md` ## Documentation / Examples - [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint` - [x] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md) Co-authored-by: Steven <[email protected]>
It looks like a simple typo.
Fixes: [slack thread](https://vercel.slack.com/archives/C01224Q5M99/p1669029502713689?thread_ts=1668452468.314249&cid=C01224Q5M99) ## Bug - [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number` - [x] Integration tests added - [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Do not directly import app-render into base-server since base-server is shared module for both nodejs SSR and edge SSR. Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated. To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that you follow the checklist sections below. Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making: --> When using custom document and importing from `next/document`, `HtmlContext` instance will mismatch due to CJS version of `next/document` is consumed. Gotta alias it to the ESM version for edge runtime ## Bug - [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number` - [x] Integration tests added - [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Testing if this reduces flakiness we've been seeing
Fixes #41995 Closes #43144 ## Bug - [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number` - [x] Integration tests added - [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md` Co-authored-by: Bruno Nascimento <[email protected]>
Currently in dev the `_devPagesManifest` includes the `/app` routes as well. However, In production, the `_buildManifest.js` does not include the `/app` routes. This causes the `/pages` router to behave differently in the two environments. This change excludes the `/app` routes from `_devPagesManifest` to make it work the same in dev/prod. Fixes #42513 Fixes #42532 ## Bug - [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number` - [ ] Integration tests added - [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md` ## Feature - [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. - [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number` - [ ] Integration tests added - [ ] Documentation added - [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not. - [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md` ## Documentation / Examples - [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint` - [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
…43145) After upgrading to Next.js 13, we started seeing the following HMR errors: ```sh $ next dev # ... warn - Fast Refresh had to perform a full reload. Read more: https://nextjs.org/docs/basic-features/fast-refresh#how-it-works TypeError: Cannot read properties of null (reading 'length') at eval (webpack-internal:///./node_modules/next/dist/client/dev/error-overlay/hot-dev-client.js:262:55) ``` This error appears related to the changes made in #42350 (cc @alexkirsz). It appears that `module.hot.check` will pass `null` when there are no updates: ```ts /** * Throws an exceptions if status() is not idle. * Check all currently loaded modules for updates and apply updates if found. * If no update was found, the callback is called with null. * If autoApply is truthy the callback will be called with all modules that were disposed. * apply() is automatically called with autoApply as options parameter. * If autoApply is not set the callback will be called with all modules that will be disposed on apply(). * @param autoApply */ check(autoApply?: boolean): Promise<null|ModuleId[]>; ``` When `updatedModules` is `null`, we skip the `apply()` call as this was producing `apply() is only allowed in ready status (state: idle)` errors. This matches [the prior behavior when `autoApply` was enabled](https://github.com/webpack/webpack/blob/8241da7f1e75c5581ba535d127fa66aeb9eb2ac8/lib/hmr/HotModuleReplacement.runtime.js#L266-L272). Fixes #43143. Also reported on Stack Overflow: - https://stackoverflow.com/questions/74415937/nextjs-typeerror-cannot-read-properties-of-null-reading-length - https://stackoverflow.com/questions/74504229/nextjs-v-13-typeerror-cannot-read-properties-of-null-reading-length I tested this change locally and no longer see these HMR errors. ## Bug - [X] Related issues linked using `fixes #number` - no related issues - [X] Integration tests added - there aren't any existing tests, afaict - [X] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md` - N/A Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <[email protected]>
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated. To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that you follow the checklist sections below. Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making: --> Closes #43130 This fixes the bug where the CLI copies files it shouldn't, by adding a `/` separator at the end of the directory name. Given `examples/next-prisma-starter` and `examples/next-prisma-starter-websockets`, only files inside the `examples/next-prisma-starter` will now be copied. Here is a repo created by the CLI after this fix, using ```bash # Inside packages/create-next-app pnpm build node dist/index.js --example https://github.com/trpc/trpc --example-path examples/next-prisma-starter ``` https://github.com/juliusmarminge/create-next-app-bugfix ## Bug - [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number` - [ ] Integration tests added - [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md` ## Feature - [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. - [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number` - [ ] Integration tests added - [ ] Documentation added - [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not. - [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md` ## Documentation / Examples - [x] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint` - [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Co-authored-by: Balázs Orbán <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Rishabh <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Balázs Orbán <[email protected]>
…43234) When creating the client entries, the `src/` prefix shouldn't be included in the entrypoint's name. Closes #42874. ## Bug - [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number` - [x] Integration tests added - [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md` ## Feature - [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. - [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number` - [ ] Integration tests added - [ ] Documentation added - [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not. - [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md` ## Documentation / Examples - [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint` - [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
It isn't clear whether the `create` step needs to be run inside an empty directory (avoiding conflicts with existing content in the current working directory), or whether it can be run in a directory with existing contents, and its output would be placed in an empty directory automatically created from the project name. ## Bug - [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number` - [ ] Integration tests added - [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md` ## Feature - [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. - [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number` - [ ] Integration tests added - [ ] Documentation added - [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not. - [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md` ## Documentation / Examples - [x] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint` - [x] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
…ges` list (#43249) Co-authored-by: Shu Ding <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <[email protected]>
We shouldn't be using arbitrary `waitFor()` and instead should use our `check` util for these tests. follow-up to #43247 x-ref: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/actions/runs/3525838483/jobs/5913081280
## Bug The `findDOMNode` will be exported from ReactDOM in esm mode, but it's not defined for SSR since SSR is using react-dom server stub bundle which doesn't contain any thing. So `import { findDOMNode } from 'react-dom'` will error in that case with bundling. Since it's only being used on client, we import ReactDOM and call `ReactDOM.findDOMNode` to avoid bundling error and adding a condition to tree-shake it off on client [slack thread](https://vercel.slack.com/archives/C03KAR5DCKC/p1670608621289259) - [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number` - [x] Integration tests added - [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
x-ref: #42660 ## Documentation / Examples - [x] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint` - [x] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Adding data attr to inlined font definition from optimizeFonts feature
## Documentation / Examples - [x] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint` - [x] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
`not ie 11` is now included in `dead` by browserslist: https://browsersl.ist/#q=defaults%2C+not+ie+11%2C+not+dead ## Documentation / Examples - [x] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint` - [x] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
The json schema was incorrectly warning because `port: ''` is valid and we document and use it in examples. The empty string is different than undefined - empty string: match only URLs without a port - undefined: match URLs with any port I noticed this when running one of our examples: ``` pnpm next dev examples/image-component ready - started server on 0.0.0.0:3000, url: http://localhost:3000 warn - Invalid next.config.js options detected: - The value at .images.remotePatterns[0].port must be 1 character or more but it was 0 characters. See more info here: https://nextjs.org/docs/messages/invalid-next-config ```
## Bug The app client entry key was in win32 slashes like `app\blog`, and when we add the new layer checking logic in #43197, `name.startsWith('app/')` doesn't work. Fixes #43854 Fixes #43902 <img width="862" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/4800338/207641886-08ffc159-0516-4609-9a1f-8c8693586122.png"> - [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number` - [x] Integration tests added - [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
This reverts commit df527e7.
Fixes #43854 , followup for #44011. Normalize the bundlePath so it works in all cases ## Bug - [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number` - [x] Integration tests added - [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
Co-authored-by: Jiachi Liu <[email protected]> This should solve the problem that CSS hash happens before PostCSS loaders. ## Bug - [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number` - [ ] Integration tests added - [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md) ## Feature - [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. - [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number` - [ ] [e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs) tests added - [ ] Documentation added - [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not. - [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md) ## Documentation / Examples - [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint` - [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md) Co-authored-by: Jiachi Liu <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Add explanation and recommendation of `font-display`. ## Bug - [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number` - [ ] Integration tests added - [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md) ## Feature - [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. - [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number` - [ ] [e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs) tests added - [ ] Documentation added - [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not. - [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md) ## Documentation / Examples - [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint` - [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md) Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <[email protected]>
Updated dependency of supertokens-auth-react
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated. To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that you follow the checklist sections below. Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making: --> These tests are run via an env variable now instead so we can remove the hard coded handling ## Bug - [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number` - [ ] Integration tests added - [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md) ## Feature - [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. - [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number` - [ ] [e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs) tests added - [ ] Documentation added - [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not. - [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md) ## Documentation / Examples - [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint` - [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Co-authored-by: Steven <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <[email protected]>
## Feature NEXT-54 When there's an error in the one of the root level pages, there's no way to handle it. The team discussed this and decided there should be a global error boundary to pick up anything not handled further down in the tree. It can be called `global-error.js`. Co-authored-by: Tim Neutkens <[email protected]>
Fix ignoring warning added in #41519
Adds a new way to write e2e tests for the Next.js core, mostly to reduce common boilerplate and make it easier to write tests for now team members. ```ts // test/e2e/app-dir/head/head.test.ts import { createNextDescribe } from 'e2e-utils' createNextDescribe( 'app dir head', { files: __dirname }, ({ next }) => { test('handles ', async () => { // get cheerio (jQuery like API to traverse HTML) const $ = await next.render$('/') // get html const html = await next.render('/') // use fetch const res = await next.fetch('/') // get browser const browser = await next.browser('/') }) })
…s. (#43473) <!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated. To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that you follow the checklist sections below. Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making: --> Partial solutions for WEB-225. One of the issue we want to improve is version bump process across multiple dependencies sharing same transitive dependencies. There were known cases of last-minute build failures of next-swc due to this. The biggest thing is we have lot of dependenceis rely on swc_core, and consolidating it altogether is tricky. PR introduces `next-binding`, which reexports all the related dependencies that next-swc and turbopack commonly uses. Unfortunately, this is not a complete solution, but at least it'll make `upfront` cost to turbopack when it try to update swc_core and others, so by the time upgrading it in next-swc we expect minimal friction. Note not 0 friction: due to how cargo behaves for the merging all of the features, there's still chances to have some build failures but meaningfully less I believe. I think the easiest way to describe before / after is having some diagrams. This is rather simplified to illustrate problems easily, i.e when it comes to actual build if there are same version of deps cargo will dedupe, so below illustaration only would occur for non-compatible version cases, etcs. **Before** ```mermaid graph TD A[next-swc] --> B(next-dev) A --> C(swc_core) A --> D(swc_emotion) D --> E(swc_core) A --> F(styled_jsx) F --> E A --> G(mdxrs) G --> H(swc_core) B --> I(swc_core) B --> J(swc_emotion) J --> K(swc_core) ``` **After** ```mermaid graph TD A[next-swc] --> B(next-binding) B --> C[swc_core] B --> D[swc_emotion] D --> I[swc_core] B --> H[styled_jsx] B --> F[next-dev] B --> J[node-file-trace] F --> C H --> I B --> E(mdxrs) E --> G(swc_core) ``` You can see repeated dependencies (`swc_core`, `swc_emotion`) occurs lot more in next-swc in `before`, including next-swc top level direct import itself. In result, update process have to align between next-swc, turbopack, swc-plugins and others. With newly proposed changes, `next-swc` no longer directly owns deps reduces those repetaed deps. At the moment of version bump, only `next-binding` need to be updated. This brings small caveat however : next-swc does not directly update `swc_core`, but have to bump turbopack and its transitive dependencies. Given our bump process usually requires to bump up turbopack anyway, I wouldn't consider this as hard blocking though.
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
See Commits and Changes for more details.
Created by pull[bot]
Can you help keep this open source service alive? 💖 Please sponsor : )