Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 15, 2019. It is now read-only.

Vote list too high - Fixes #138 #146

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Apr 27, 2017
Merged

Conversation

slaweet
Copy link
Contributor

@slaweet slaweet commented Apr 26, 2017

Use md-chips in vote dialog.

Fixes #138 by having multiple delegates on one line, thus the list is not so high.

slaweet added 4 commits April 26, 2017 12:39
Fixes #138 by having multiple delegates on one line,
thus the list is not so high
This reverts commit d933906.

Now you can search delegates in the vote dialog, so it makes sense to
open it even when no delegates selected
@slaweet slaweet added this to the Version 1.0.0 milestone Apr 26, 2017
@slaweet slaweet requested a review from karmacoma April 26, 2017 10:44
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-1.5%) to 86.022% when pulling 130f339 on 138_vote-list-too-high into 126b197 on development.

@karmacoma karmacoma changed the title Vote list too high Vote list too high - Fixes #138 Apr 26, 2017
@karmacoma karmacoma added the bug label Apr 26, 2017
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.5%) to 87.097% when pulling 05560bd on 138_vote-list-too-high into 126b197 on development.

@karmacoma karmacoma modified the milestone: Version 1.0.0 Apr 26, 2017
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-2.2%) to 85.37% when pulling f951313 on 138_vote-list-too-high into 126b197 on development.

Copy link
Contributor

@karmacoma karmacoma left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice work @slaweet 👍 This is more than expected, works really well, thanks.

@karmacoma karmacoma merged commit 4c09077 into development Apr 27, 2017
@karmacoma karmacoma deleted the 138_vote-list-too-high branch April 27, 2017 10:26
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants