-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
(3/n) Support 2D Parallelism - Efficient loading of full-state checkpoints #19870
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
awaelchli
force-pushed
the
feature/tp-full-ckpt-load
branch
from
May 15, 2024 12:21
86d8d16
to
1170618
Compare
awaelchli
force-pushed
the
feature/tp-full-ckpt-load
branch
from
May 15, 2024 12:22
1170618
to
1a0887e
Compare
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
awaelchli
changed the title
(3/n) Support 2D Parallelism - More efficient loading of full-state checkpoints
(3/n) Support 2D Parallelism - Efficient loading of full-state checkpoints
May 15, 2024
awaelchli
commented
May 15, 2024
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #19870 +/- ##
=========================================
- Coverage 84% 59% -25%
=========================================
Files 425 420 -5
Lines 35010 34925 -85
=========================================
- Hits 29369 20527 -8842
- Misses 5641 14398 +8757 |
justusschock
approved these changes
May 15, 2024
lantiga
approved these changes
May 15, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks great
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
fabric
lightning.fabric.Fabric
performance
pl
Generic label for PyTorch Lightning package
ready
PRs ready to be merged
refactor
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does this PR do?
Follow-up to #19852.
I found that loading large full-state-dict checkpoints into a distributed model can lead to OOM (e.g. Llama 3 70B) because PyTorch's approach of loading on rank-0, then broadcasting and redistributing is applied to the entire checkpoint at once, instead of on a per-parameter or per-module basis (see comment).
In this PR, I load the checkpoint per-parameter, which seems to work as it should.
Mini inference benchmark on Llama 3 8B (8xA100)
Before:
4.64 GB (peak memory usage), 13.43 seconds to load
Now:
3.20 GB (peak memory usage), 13.72 seconds to load
Llama 3 70B (8xA100)
Before:
OOM
Now:
20.01 GB (peak memory usage), 40.73 seconds to load
Benchmarks done with this LitGPT branch.
cc @justusschock @awaelchli @carmocca @Borda