You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Description
The prism3D15N geometry seems to be buggy. Here (test_Prism3D15N.zip) you can find a minimal test case. It is a structural modal analysis with one SmallDisplacementElement3D15N which uses this prism. The single included element follows the Kratos node ordering specified here. However, if one runs the analysis, it throws an error saying that the element base class is called. From the other output, it seems that something is very wrong with the computation of the Jacobian or the shape function (derivatives).
Now, I checked, if there is a test for this geometry. However, it seems not. In fact, a corresponding test was once committed but then commented out. @loumalouomega from the git history, I noticed that you commented it out saying in the title of the corresponding commit that "Prism3D15 [is](not working yet, the element has some problems to be fixed in the future)".
So my questions is. Did anybody experience this bug before or know a solution for it? It would be great if anyone involved in the geometry implementation could have a look into the element and check if there is something fishy.
Side note: If one changes the prism3D15N to a prism3D6N, the minimal example attached runs again without errors (relevant mdpas are provided). So it just seems to be a bug of the quadratic prism (and not the solver / model setup, etc...).
Scope
KratosCore
To Reproduce
Minimal example attached
Expected behavior
The simulation (a modal analysis) should run through and print the eigenvalue of the first mode
Environment
OS: Windows
Branch: master
Python 3.9.7
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The mythical TODO, maybe I wrote that, if git says so. We can check the problem. The easiest way is with a simple patch test, that can be mono-element.
The mythical TODO, maybe I wrote that, if git says so. We can check the problem. The easiest way is with a simple patch test, that can be mono-element.
From the quoted test a priori looks like an ordering issue, I will check if I can
Description
The prism3D15N geometry seems to be buggy. Here (test_Prism3D15N.zip) you can find a minimal test case. It is a structural modal analysis with one SmallDisplacementElement3D15N which uses this prism. The single included element follows the Kratos node ordering specified here. However, if one runs the analysis, it throws an error saying that the element base class is called. From the other output, it seems that something is very wrong with the computation of the Jacobian or the shape function (derivatives).
Now, I checked, if there is a test for this geometry. However, it seems not. In fact, a corresponding test was once committed but then commented out. @loumalouomega from the git history, I noticed that you commented it out saying in the title of the corresponding commit that "Prism3D15 [is](not working yet, the element has some problems to be fixed in the future)".
So my questions is. Did anybody experience this bug before or know a solution for it? It would be great if anyone involved in the geometry implementation could have a look into the element and check if there is something fishy.
Side note: If one changes the prism3D15N to a prism3D6N, the minimal example attached runs again without errors (relevant mdpas are provided). So it just seems to be a bug of the quadratic prism (and not the solver / model setup, etc...).
Scope
To Reproduce
Minimal example attached
Expected behavior
The simulation (a modal analysis) should run through and print the eigenvalue of the first mode
Environment
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: