-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 80
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Have an attribute on signals to say that that signal already exists #286
Comments
ahayzen-kdab
added a commit
to ahayzen-kdab/cxx-qt
that referenced
this issue
Jan 16, 2023
ahayzen-kdab
added a commit
to ahayzen-kdab/cxx-qt
that referenced
this issue
Jan 16, 2023
ahayzen-kdab
added a commit
to ahayzen-kdab/cxx-qt
that referenced
this issue
Jan 16, 2023
ahayzen-kdab
added a commit
to ahayzen-kdab/cxx-qt
that referenced
this issue
Jan 16, 2023
Gone with |
ahayzen-kdab
added a commit
to ahayzen-kdab/cxx-qt
that referenced
this issue
Jan 24, 2023
Be-ing
pushed a commit
to ahayzen-kdab/cxx-qt
that referenced
this issue
Jan 24, 2023
ahayzen-kdab
added a commit
to ahayzen-kdab/cxx-qt
that referenced
this issue
Jan 31, 2023
ahayzen-kdab
added a commit
to ahayzen-kdab/cxx-qt
that referenced
this issue
Jan 31, 2023
Be-ing
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 1, 2023
przempore
pushed a commit
to przempore/cxx-qt
that referenced
this issue
Mar 15, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Have an attribute on signals to say that that signal already exists, this would then allow you to declare that dataChanged already exists on the base class (eg for a listmodel).
This would then generate the CXX bridge for the dataChanged method, which then means CXX does the asserts that a function exists that matches.
Do we need to check it's a Q_SIGNAL (and can we?) or is just a function enough.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: