You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
FactorMetadata not following multihypo particular to each solve in the same way that the factor evaluation does. Factor evaluation is working correctly, this is part of a more advanced feature for special sampler and fmd in factor arguments. This will likely become a part of revamping FMD which is due to happen anyway.
FactorMetadata not following multihypo particular to each solve in the same way that the factor evaluation does. Factor evaluation is working correctly, this is part of a more advanced feature for special sampler and fmd in factor arguments. This will likely become a part of revamping FMD which is due to happen anyway.
Also see:
Discussion: Pass variables to factor evaluation so that we can use variable data? #784
Towards immutable FactorMetadata(...) #825
standardize special sampler using new FMd / CalcResidual #927
more testing of specialSampler #692
approxConvBinary does not yet support specialSampler #640
Manifest VariableTypes (Singleton model) and new FMD #783 (comment)
Remove Union types from FactorMetadata #383
Initial test already exists by must be updated as this gets fixed, see new test for fmd bug on multihypo #1024
Also see Deprecate AbstractRelativeRoots shuffleX, preserve partial #1072
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: