up compat BoundaryValDiffEq

[dehann]

Hi, I found the following compat issue. Will let PR CI tests run and see if there are any issues.

[dehann]

Not sure why CompatHelper did not catch this. I looked around for related issues or PR but didn't immediately see one.

[kellertuer]

Interesting; it might be that CompatHelper does not check weak dependencies? At least the CI runs do not look like it would consider those; maybe we should check that those are included as well then.

[kellertuer]

Yes, my impression was correct, see JuliaRegistries/CompatHelper.jl#452

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #657 (ff58e67) into master (106a8f3) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #657   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.22%   99.22%           
=======================================
  Files         106      106           
  Lines       10481    10481           
=======================================
  Hits        10400    10400           
  Misses         81       81           

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

[mateuszbaran]

Thanks! Before merging it would be good to check if BoundaryValueDiffEq v5 is actually used on CI.

[mateuszbaran]

Hm, there seems to be a huge problem with BoundaryValueDiffEq v5

[mateuszbaran]

I will close this in favor of #672 .