Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix bug in backsolve of sparse hermitian matrices #21165

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 30, 2017

Conversation

ranjanan
Copy link
Contributor

@ranjanan ranjanan commented Mar 26, 2017

Will add Added a benchmark to BaseBenchmarks too.

cc: @andreasnoack

@StefanKarpinski
Copy link
Member

Are there any computational tests that would distinguish the Hermitian branch from LU?

@andreasnoack
Copy link
Member

Are there any computational tests that would distinguish the Hermitian branch from LU?

In theory, it might be possible because the LU branch is a bit more numerically stable but I think the benchmark route is more reliable. Let's try to run the sparse benchmarks when JuliaCI/BaseBenchmarks.jl#68 has been merged.

@ararslan ararslan added the linear algebra Linear algebra label Mar 27, 2017
@vchuravy vchuravy added this to the 0.6.0 milestone Mar 27, 2017
@tkelman
Copy link
Contributor

tkelman commented Mar 30, 2017

@nanosoldier runbenchmarks(ALL, vs = ":master") since I forget how to ask for just sparse benchmarks

@nanosoldier
Copy link
Collaborator

Your benchmark job has completed - possible performance regressions were detected. A full report can be found here. cc @jrevels

@andreasnoack andreasnoack merged commit 9baadbf into JuliaLang:master Mar 30, 2017
@ranjanan ranjanan deleted the RA/sparse branch March 31, 2017 08:31
@iamnapo iamnapo mentioned this pull request Apr 5, 2017
tkelman pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 3, 2017
tkelman pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 3, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
linear algebra Linear algebra
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants