Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "sort for NTuple and other iterables (#804)" #812

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 1, 2023

Conversation

martinholters
Copy link
Member

This reverts commit c59d116. Closes #811.

This is likely to break NDTensors, but might still be considered a bugfix as it makes Compat behave more like most recent Julia, see discussion in #811.

@ericphanson
Copy link

ericphanson commented Nov 29, 2023

To run nanosoldier on this PR, a Compat.jl admin needs to get a secret from @maleadt to install the webhook on the repo: https://github.com/JuliaCI/Nanosoldier.jl/tree/master/res#repository-configuration. Then you can trigger it following https://github.com/JuliaCI/Nanosoldier.jl#reverse-ci-for-packages

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 29, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (db2077e) 92.83% compared to head (165e032) 95.34%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #812      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   92.83%   95.34%   +2.51%     
==========================================
  Files           2        2              
  Lines         335      301      -34     
==========================================
- Hits          311      287      -24     
+ Misses         24       14      -10     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@martinholters
Copy link
Member Author

To run nanosoldier on this PR, a Compat.jl admin needs to get a secret from @maleadt to install the webhook on the repo: https://github.com/JuliaCI/Nanosoldier.jl/tree/master/res#repository-configuration. Then you can trigger it following https://github.com/JuliaCI/Nanosoldier.jl#reverse-ci-for-packages

Ah. @KristofferC are you an admin for this repo and can you do that?

@KristofferC
Copy link
Member

Let's try this:

@nanosoldier runtests()

@nanosoldier
Copy link

Update on PkgEvalJob 165e032 vs. db2077e: Accepted

Copy link
Member

@LilithHafner LilithHafner left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

From the readme

Features in the development versions of julia may be added and released in Compat.jl. However, such features are considered experimental until the relevant julia version is released. These features can be changed or removed without incrementing the major version of Compat.jl if necessary to match changes in julia.

So this revert is explicitly allowed by the declared public API and therefore does not require a major version bump. Any packages that depended on this were depending on experimental features. Whether or not nanosoldier reports breakage this LGTM (unless the entire ecosystem breaks)

This should also be reverted on the 3.x branch. EDIT: it was never on the 3.x branch.

@nanosoldier
Copy link

Update on PkgEvalJob 165e032 vs. db2077e: Running

@nanosoldier
Copy link

The package evaluation job you requested has completed - possible new issues were detected.
The full report is available.

@martinholters
Copy link
Member Author

Two PkgEval failures (ITensorVisualizationBase and ITensorGaussianMPS), both caused by

    [1] permutedims_combine_output(...)
      @ NDTensors ~/.julia/packages/NDTensors/kR4oQ/src/blocksparse/blocksparsetensor.jl:439

Thanks to @LilithHafner for actually reading the README, I'm totally fine with merging this, but we might want to give a heads-up at NDTensors.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants