-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
update nservicebus in arc4u nservicebus packages #127
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
update nservicebus.rabbitmq to .net 8 version + adjuster publisherrootingtopology
WalkthroughThe pull request includes modifications to project files for Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant PublisherRootingTopology
participant MessageMetadata
Client->>PublisherRootingTopology: SetupSubscription(channel, MessageMetadata, subscriberName)
PublisherRootingTopology->>MessageMetadata: Process subscription
Client->>PublisherRootingTopology: TeardownSubscription(channel, MessageMetadata, subscriberName)
PublisherRootingTopology->>MessageMetadata: Process unsubscription
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- src/Arc4u.Standard.NServiceBus.Core/Arc4u.Standard.NServiceBus.Core.csproj (1 hunks)
- src/Arc4u.Standard.NServiceBus.RabbitMQ/Arc4u.Standard.NServiceBus.RabbitMQ.csproj (1 hunks)
- src/Arc4u.Standard.NServiceBus.RabbitMQ/Routing/PublisherRootingTopology.cs (2 hunks)
- src/Arc4u.Standard.NServiceBus/Arc4u.Standard.NServiceBus.csproj (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (11)
src/Arc4u.Standard.NServiceBus.Core/Arc4u.Standard.NServiceBus.Core.csproj (3)
6-10
: Consider potential code adjustments for different NServiceBus versions.Given that different NServiceBus versions are used for net6.0 (8.2.3) and net8.0 (9.1.1), it's important to ensure that the code is compatible with both versions. There might be API differences or new features in version 9.x that could be utilized for the net8.0 target.
To help identify potential areas requiring adjustment, run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for NServiceBus-related code that might need adjustments echo "Searching for NServiceBus usage:" rg --type csharp "NServiceBus" ./srcReview the results to identify any code that might need to be updated or optimized for the different NServiceBus versions.
6-10
: Verify NServiceBus.RabbitMQ package update.The PR objectives mentioned updating the NServiceBus.RabbitMQ package to the .NET 8 version. However, this file only shows updates to the core NServiceBus package. Could you please confirm if the NServiceBus.RabbitMQ package update is handled in a different file?
To check for NServiceBus.RabbitMQ package references in other project files:
#!/bin/bash # Search for NServiceBus.RabbitMQ package references echo "Searching for NServiceBus.RabbitMQ package references:" rg --type xml "PackageReference.*NServiceBus\.RabbitMQ" ./srcThis will help identify where the NServiceBus.RabbitMQ package is referenced and if it has been updated as per the PR objectives.
6-10
: LGTM! The NServiceBus package references have been updated correctly.The changes align well with the PR objectives:
- Conditional ItemGroups have been added for net6.0 and net8.0 frameworks.
- NServiceBus versions have been updated:
- Version 8.2.3 for net6.0
- Version 9.1.1 for net8.0
These updates ensure compatibility with .NET 8 while maintaining support for .NET 6.
To ensure these are the latest stable versions, let's verify:
src/Arc4u.Standard.NServiceBus/Arc4u.Standard.NServiceBus.csproj (1)
12-13
: Approve NServiceBus addition for .NET 8.0, but consider multi-targeting implications.The addition of NServiceBus 9.1.1 for .NET 8.0 aligns with the PR objectives. This multi-targeting approach allows for broader compatibility but introduces some considerations:
- The project now uses different NServiceBus versions for different target frameworks (8.2.3 for .NET 6.0 and 9.1.1 for .NET 8.0).
- This may lead to different behavior depending on the target framework, which could complicate testing and maintenance.
Please ensure that:
- The codebase is compatible with both NServiceBus 8.x and 9.x.
- You have strategies in place to handle any differences in behavior between the two versions.
- Your CI/CD pipeline is set up to build and test both target frameworks.
Run the following script to check for conditional compilation directives that might be needed:
src/Arc4u.Standard.NServiceBus.RabbitMQ/Arc4u.Standard.NServiceBus.RabbitMQ.csproj (3)
Line range hint
1-24
: Summary of changes and recommendations
- The NServiceBus.RabbitMQ package references have been correctly updated for both .NET 6 and .NET 8 target frameworks.
- The changes align with the PR objective of updating NServiceBus packages to support .NET 8.
- It's recommended to verify the code compatibility with both versions of NServiceBus.RabbitMQ (8.0.5 and 9.1.1) and make any necessary adjustments.
- The project structure, including references to other Arc4u.Standard projects, remains unchanged.
Overall, the changes look good, but please ensure thorough testing across both target frameworks to catch any potential issues arising from the package updates.
9-14
: Verify code compatibility with different NServiceBus.RabbitMQ versions.While the package references are correctly updated, it's important to ensure that the codebase is compatible with both versions (8.0.5 for .NET 6 and 9.1.1 for .NET 8). There might be breaking changes or new features between these versions that need to be addressed.
To help with this, let's check for any usage of NServiceBus.RabbitMQ types or methods that might have changed:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usage of NServiceBus.RabbitMQ types or methods rg --type csharp "NServiceBus\.RabbitMQ" ./srcPlease review the search results and consult the changelog or migration guide for NServiceBus.RabbitMQ to ensure all necessary code updates have been made.
9-14
: Package references updated correctly for different target frameworks.The changes to the NServiceBus.RabbitMQ package references are appropriate:
- For .NET 6.0, the package version is updated to 8.0.5.
- For .NET 8.0, a new reference is added with version 9.1.1.
This update aligns with the PR objective of updating the NServiceBus packages to support .NET 8. The conditional ItemGroup elements ensure that the correct package version is used for each target framework.
To ensure these are the latest stable versions, let's verify:
src/Arc4u.Standard.NServiceBus.RabbitMQ/Routing/PublisherRootingTopology.cs (4)
7-7
: LGTM: New import added for MessageMetadata.The new import
using NServiceBus.Unicast.Messages;
is consistent with the changes made to the method signatures. It's necessary for using theMessageMetadata
type.
24-26
:⚠️ Potential issueVerify impact of signature change and implement method body.
The
TeardownSubscription
method signature has been updated to useMessageMetadata
instead ofType
. This change aligns with theSetupSubscription
method change but could potentially break existing code that uses this method. The method body is also empty, indicating missing implementation.
- Please verify that all callers of this method have been updated to use
MessageMetadata
.- Implement the method body to tear down the subscription using the
MessageMetadata
.To verify the impact of this change, run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for calls to TeardownSubscription method rg --type csharp "TeardownSubscription\s*\(" -A 3This will help identify any places where the method is called and ensure they are updated accordingly.
Line range hint
1-53
: Review overall consistency and impact of changes.The changes to
SetupSubscription
andTeardownSubscription
methods introduce potential inconsistencies and issues:
Interface Compliance: Verify that these changes align with the
IRoutingTopology
interface. If the interface still usesType
, this implementation will not comply.Implementation Consistency: The
Publish
method still usesType
. Consider whether it should also be updated to useMessageMetadata
for consistency.Empty Method Bodies: Implement the bodies of
SetupSubscription
andTeardownSubscription
to avoid unexpected behavior.Documentation: Update any existing documentation or XML comments to reflect these changes.
To ensure consistency and proper implementation, consider the following:
- Review the
IRoutingTopology
interface and update it if necessary.- Implement the bodies of
SetupSubscription
andTeardownSubscription
.- Consider updating other methods like
Publish
to useMessageMetadata
if appropriate.- Add XML documentation to explain the usage of
MessageMetadata
in these methods.Run the following script to check the
IRoutingTopology
interface definition:#!/bin/bash # Search for IRoutingTopology interface definition rg --type csharp "interface\s+IRoutingTopology" -A 20This will help ensure that the changes in
PublisherRootingTopology
align with the interface definition.
20-22
:⚠️ Potential issueVerify impact of signature change and implement method body.
The
SetupSubscription
method signature has been updated to useMessageMetadata
instead ofType
. This change might provide more detailed information about the message, but it could potentially break existing code that uses this method. Additionally, the method body is empty, which suggests that the implementation is missing.
- Please verify that all callers of this method have been updated to use
MessageMetadata
.- Implement the method body to set up the subscription using the
MessageMetadata
.To verify the impact of this change, run the following script:
This will help identify any places where the method is called and ensure they are updated accordingly.
✅ Verification successful
Execute a revised script to locate all
SetupSubscription
method calls with the updatedMessageMetadata
parameter.To ensure that all callers have been updated to use
MessageMetadata
, please run the following script:
Re-execute the search for all
SetupSubscription
method calls with the updatedMessageMetadata
parameter using an improved pattern.To ensure all instances are captured, please run the following script:
[/run_scripts]
Re-execute the search for all
SetupSubscription
method calls with any parameters to ensure comprehensive verification.To confirm whether there are any remaining calls to
SetupSubscription
, please run the following script:[/run_scripts]
Signature change verified with no impact found.
The
SetupSubscription
method has been updated to useMessageMetadata
instead ofType
. Since no calls to this method were found in the codebase, there are no existing dependencies affected by this change. Additionally, the empty method body indicates that implementation is pending and does not affect current functionality.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for calls to SetupSubscription method rg --type csharp "SetupSubscription\s*\(" -A 3Length of output: 55
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for calls to SetupSubscription method with MessageMetadata parameter rg --type csharp 'SetupSubscription\s*\(\s*[^,]+,\s*MessageMetadata\s*,\s*[^)]+\)' -A 3Length of output: 89
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for SetupSubscription method calls with MessageMetadata parameter, allowing for flexible formatting rg --type csharp 'SetupSubscription\s*\(\s*[^,]+,\s*MessageMetadata\s*,\s*[^)]+\)' -A 3Length of output: 89
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for all calls to SetupSubscription method regardless of parameters rg --type csharp 'SetupSubscription\s*\(' -A 3Length of output: 472
<ItemGroup Condition=" '$(TargetFramework)' == 'net6.0' "> | ||
<PackageReference Include="Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions" Version="6.0.4" /> | ||
<PackageReference Include="NServiceBus" Version="8.2.3" /> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
NServiceBus API usages detected that may require attention.
The update to NServiceBus version 8.2.3 introduces several usages of critical APIs that might be affected by breaking changes in the new version:
IEndpointConfiguration
insrc/Arc4u.Standard.NServiceBus.Core/IEndpointConfiguration.cs
ReceiverEndpointConfigurationBase
andSenderEndpointConfigBase
classes in respective directories- Usage of
EndpointConfiguration
andTransportExtensions
in multiple files
Please ensure that:
- All instances of
EndpointConfiguration
andTransportExtensions
are compatible with NServiceBus 8.2.3. - Review the NServiceBus upgrade documentation for any breaking changes.
- Conduct thorough testing to verify that the updated package does not introduce regressions.
🔗 Analysis chain
Approve NServiceBus update for .NET 6.0, but verify compatibility.
The update of NServiceBus to version 8.2.3 for .NET 6.0 aligns with the PR objectives. However, this is a significant version bump that may introduce breaking changes.
Please ensure that:
- The codebase is compatible with NServiceBus 8.x.
- All necessary migration steps have been followed.
- The application has been thoroughly tested with this new version.
Run the following script to check for potential compatibility issues:
Syntax error detected in the previous script. Generating a corrected version to continue verification.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for NServiceBus API usage that might be affected by the version update.
# Test: Search for common NServiceBus types and methods that might have changed.
rg --type csharp -i '(INeedInitialization|IWantToRunWhenBusStartsAndStops|IWantToRunBeforeConfigurationIsFinalized|EndpointConfiguration|TransportExtensions)'
Length of output: 4265
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for NServiceBus API usage that might be affected by the version update.
# Test: Search for common NServiceBus types and methods that might have changed.
rg --type csharp -i '(INeedInitialization|IWantToRunWhenBusStartsAndStops|IWantToRunBeforeConfigurationIsFinalized|EndpointConfiguration|TransportExtensions)'
Length of output: 3408
Hi @gogessj4, I will discuss this tomorrow during the architecture meeting and build a new version in preview so you can test it before I release it. |
update nservicebus in arc4u nservicebus packages
update nservicebus.rabbitmq to .net 8 version + adjuste publisherrootingtopology
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes