Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bgpd: fix update-source for ipv6 (backport #9498) #9501

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 26, 2021

Conversation

mergify[bot]
Copy link

@mergify mergify bot commented Aug 26, 2021

This is an automatic backport of pull request #9498 done by Mergify.


Mergify commands and options

More conditions and actions can be found in the documentation.

You can also trigger Mergify actions by commenting on this pull request:

  • @Mergifyio refresh will re-evaluate the rules
  • @Mergifyio rebase will rebase this PR on its base branch
  • @Mergifyio update will merge the base branch into this PR
  • @Mergifyio backport <destination> will backport this PR on <destination> branch

Additionally, on Mergify dashboard you can:

  • look at your merge queues
  • generate the Mergify configuration with the config editor.

Finally, you can contact us on https://mergify.io/

There's no IPv6 LL address on loopback/vrf interfaces. So if the user
configures update-source, the session is never going to be established.

Signed-off-by: Igor Ryzhov <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 2ebb354)
Copy link

@polychaeta polychaeta left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for your contribution to FRR!

Style checking failed; check logs

If you are a new contributor to FRR, please see our contributing guidelines.

After making changes, you do not need to create a new PR. You should perform an amend or interactive rebase followed by a force push.

@LabN-CI
Copy link
Collaborator

LabN-CI commented Aug 26, 2021

💚 Basic BGPD CI results: SUCCESS, 0 tests failed

Results table
_ _
Result SUCCESS git merge/9501 013575f
Date 08/26/2021
Start 09:50:24
Finish 10:16:43
Run-Time 26:19
Total 1813
Pass 1813
Fail 0
Valgrind-Errors 0
Valgrind-Loss 0
Details vncregress-2021-08-26-09:50:24.txt
Log autoscript-2021-08-26-09:51:37.log.bz2
Memory 514 511 421

For details, please contact louberger

@idryzhov
Copy link
Contributor

ci:rerun

@NetDEF-CI
Copy link
Collaborator

NetDEF-CI commented Aug 26, 2021

Continuous Integration Result: FAILED

Continuous Integration Result: FAILED

See below for issues.
CI System Testrun URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-21403/

This is a comment from an automated CI system.
For questions and feedback in regards to this CI system, please feel free to email
Martin Winter - mwinter (at) opensourcerouting.org.

Get source / Pull Request: Successful

Building Stage: Successful

Basic Tests: Failed

Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 6: Failed (click for details)

Topology Test Results are at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TOPO6U18I386-21403/test

Topology Tests failed for Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 6:

2021-08-26 14:32:16,871 ERROR: r1: bgpd left a dead pidfile (pid=25751)
2021-08-26 14:32:36,282 ERROR: spine1: bgpd left a dead pidfile (pid=29521)
2021-08-26 14:34:56,505 ERROR: ce3: bgpd left a dead pidfile (pid=32372)
2021-08-26 14:47:00,724 ERROR: 'router_json_cmp' failed after 129.25 seconds
2021-08-26 14:47:00,728 ERROR: assert failed at "bgp_vrf_lite_ipv6_rtadv.test_bgp_vrf_lite_ipv6_rtadv/test_protocols_convergence": "r1" JSON output mismatches
assert Generated JSON diff error report:
  
  > $->2001:db8:1::/64: d1 has Array of length 1 but in d2 it is of length 2
*** defaultIntf: warning: r1 has no interfaces

see full log at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-21403/artifact/TOPO6U18I386/ErrorLog/log_topotests.txt

Successful on other platforms/tests
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 5
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 4
  • Static analyzer (clang)
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 0
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 9
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 7
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 9
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 0
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 5
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 4
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 0
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 5
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 9
  • IPv4 ldp protocol on Ubuntu 18.04
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 4
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 0
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 3
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 9
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 5
  • Fedora 29 rpm pkg check
  • IPv6 protocols on Ubuntu 18.04
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 1
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 8
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 6
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 4
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 5
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 4
  • IPv4 protocols on Ubuntu 18.04
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 6
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 8
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 7
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 2
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 7
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 1
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 7
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 2
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 6
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 6
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 2
  • Ubuntu 16.04 deb pkg check
  • Ubuntu 18.04 deb pkg check
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 2
  • Ubuntu 20.04 deb pkg check
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 1
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 3
  • Debian 9 deb pkg check
  • Debian 10 deb pkg check
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 2
  • CentOS 7 rpm pkg check
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 8
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 3
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 9
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 8
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 0
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 3
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 7
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 1
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 8
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 3
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 1

@idryzhov
Copy link
Contributor

ci:rerun

@NetDEF-CI
Copy link
Collaborator

NetDEF-CI commented Aug 26, 2021

Continuous Integration Result: SUCCESSFUL

Continuous Integration Result: SUCCESSFUL

Congratulations, this patch passed basic tests

Tested-by: NetDEF / OpenSourceRouting.org CI System

CI System Testrun URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-21408/

This is a comment from an automated CI system.
For questions and feedback in regards to this CI system, please feel free to email
Martin Winter - mwinter (at) opensourcerouting.org.

@mwinter-osr mwinter-osr merged commit 0640479 into stable/8.0 Aug 26, 2021
@NetDEF-CI
Copy link
Collaborator

Continuous Integration Result: SUCCESSFUL

Congratulations, this patch passed basic tests

Tested-by: NetDEF / OpenSourceRouting.org CI System

CI System Testrun URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-21416/

This is a comment from an automated CI system.
For questions and feedback in regards to this CI system, please feel free to email
Martin Winter - mwinter (at) opensourcerouting.org.

@ton31337 ton31337 deleted the mergify/bp/stable/8.0/pr-9498 branch October 25, 2024 10:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants