Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor on missing details flow #49452

Merged
merged 22 commits into from
Oct 2, 2024

Conversation

shubham1206agra
Copy link
Contributor

@shubham1206agra shubham1206agra commented Sep 19, 2024

Details

Fixed Issues

$ #48487

Tests

  1. Issue Expensify card where personal details for workspace member who does not have all the personal details set
  2. Observe you see a Add personal details button in Workspace chat.
  3. Click on Add personal details, and fill the details.
  4. Observe that your private personal details got filled, and you no longer see Add personal details button.
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Same as Tests

QA Steps

Same as Tests

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
Screen.Recording.2024-10-01.at.6.37.45.PM.mov
iOS: Native
Screen.Recording.2024-10-01.at.7.12.55.PM.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
Screen.Recording.2024-10-01.at.12.12.52.PM.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2024-10-01.at.12.02.49.PM.mov
MacOS: Desktop
Screen.Recording.2024-10-01.at.7.00.10.PM.mov

@shubham1206agra
Copy link
Contributor Author

@allgandalf Please start review here.

cc @mountiny

@mountiny
Copy link
Contributor

Running a test build. @allgandalf are you going to be able to take this review and testing?

@allgandalf
Copy link
Contributor

Running a test build. @allgandalf are you going to be able to take this review and testing?

For sure! I will review later today/tomorrow

Copy link
Contributor

@allgandalf
Copy link
Contributor

@shubham1206agra what's your ETA for this PR?

Copy link
Contributor

@allgandalf allgandalf left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just overviewed the code, will review in depth once this is marked as ready for review

src/libs/Navigation/linkingConfig/config.ts Show resolved Hide resolved
src/pages/MissingPersonalDetails/index.tsx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@shubham1206agra
Copy link
Contributor Author

@shubham1206agra what's your ETA for this PR?

@allgandalf I need you to first go through entire flow for bugs. If no bugs are found, I will finish the checklist.

@allgandalf
Copy link
Contributor

@shubham1206agra please fix the ESLint error

@shubham1206agra
Copy link
Contributor Author

This error is unrelated to this PR

@allgandalf
Copy link
Contributor

so are we going to suppress that error ?

@shubham1206agra
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ignore the error

@allgandalf
Copy link
Contributor

BUG: No address auto recommendation, we get no result found:

Screen.Recording.2024-09-24.at.7.33.41.PM.mov

@shubham1206agra
Copy link
Contributor Author

BUG: No address auto recommendation, we get no result found:

Screen.Recording.2024-09-24.at.7.33.41.PM.mov

Have you confirmed this on main?

@allgandalf
Copy link
Contributor

Bug: RHP gets dismissed if we refresh and press back button:

Screen.Recording.2024-09-24.at.7.59.03.PM.mov

@allgandalf
Copy link
Contributor

Have you confirmed this on main?

Nope please check and let me know

@allgandalf
Copy link
Contributor

This branch has conflicts @shubham1206agra

@allgandalf
Copy link
Contributor

Can you also merge main @shubham1206agra , there is a infinite loader in personal details

Screen.Recording.2024-09-24.at.8.31.13.PM.mov

@shubham1206agra
Copy link
Contributor Author

Bug: RHP gets dismissed if we refresh and press back button:

Screen.Recording.2024-09-24.at.7.59.03.PM.mov

Because you are on the first step

@allgandalf
Copy link
Contributor

allgandalf commented Sep 24, 2024

Because you are on the first step

Actual Bug

Wait so the actual bug is that we get to the first page whenever we refresh, we should stay on the same page whenever we refresh, please update accordingly

@allgandalf
Copy link
Contributor

Bug

Whitespaces are not trimmed for legal name:

Empty spaces are visible on the confirmation page as well.
Screenshot 2024-09-24 at 8 42 47 PM

@mountiny
Copy link
Contributor

mountiny commented Oct 1, 2024

@shubham1206agra There are some conflicts, can you please address them and then we can try to get through the review asap

I am not sure since I copied this spacing from VBBA flow.

While it's the same, can you help Jon by checking what is the spacing in the code? then we can adjust it in some future task (not here)

@shubham1206agra
Copy link
Contributor Author

@shubham1206agra There are some conflicts, can you please address them and then we can try to get through the review asap

I am not sure since I copied this spacing from VBBA flow.

While it's the same, can you help Jon by checking what is the spacing in the code? then we can adjust it in some future task (not here)

@dubielzyk-expensify I am seeing marginTop: 24 being used.

@dubielzyk-expensify
Copy link
Contributor

Can we change that to marginTop: 20 instead?

@shubham1206agra
Copy link
Contributor Author

@dubielzyk-expensify Done

@allgandalf
Copy link
Contributor

@shubham1206agra merge main, android build is broken on your branch

@allgandalf
Copy link
Contributor

allgandalf commented Oct 2, 2024

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Screen.Recording.2024-10-02.at.6.48.51.PM.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome Screenshot 2024-10-02 at 6 52 01 PM
iOS: Native
Screen.Recording.2024-10-02.at.6.40.06.PM.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
Screen.Recording.2024-10-02.at.6.42.22.PM.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2024-10-02.at.6.34.39.PM.mov
MacOS: Desktop
Screen.Recording.2024-10-02.at.6.38.09.PM.mov

Copy link
Contributor

@allgandalf allgandalf left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

flow works.

@mountiny I leave the call to you if we want to merge this one with the failing workflow or we should fix that

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from mountiny October 2, 2024 13:23
mountiny
mountiny previously approved these changes Oct 2, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@mountiny mountiny left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just some small comments @shubham1206agra

src/hooks/usePersonalDetailsFormSubmit.ts Show resolved Hide resolved
src/hooks/usePersonalDetailsFormSubmit.ts Show resolved Hide resolved
src/hooks/usePersonalDetailsFormSubmit.ts Show resolved Hide resolved
src/hooks/usePersonalDetailsFormSubmit.ts Show resolved Hide resolved
src/pages/MissingPersonalDetails/substeps/Confirmation.tsx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
mountiny
mountiny previously approved these changes Oct 2, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@mountiny mountiny left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

Copy link
Contributor

@mountiny mountiny left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@mountiny mountiny merged commit 05dcac8 into Expensify:main Oct 2, 2024
18 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Oct 2, 2024

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 3, 2024

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 9.0.44-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@isagoico
Copy link

isagoico commented Oct 4, 2024

We tested this one and if this specifically for the Physical Card flow it's a pass 🎉 I'm checking in #qa if this should still happen when issuing a virtual card (my theory is not but just to be safe)

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 4, 2024

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/jasperhuangg in version: 9.0.44-12 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 failure ❌
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@mountiny
Copy link
Contributor

mountiny commented Oct 6, 2024

Correct only physical!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants