Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[TS migration] Migrate 'FullscreenLoadingIndicator.js' component to TypeScript #29988

Conversation

MaciejSWM
Copy link
Contributor

@MaciejSWM MaciejSWM commented Oct 19, 2023

Details

Fixed Issues

$ #25010
PROPOSAL:

Tests

  • In DisplayNamePage.js add an early return:
    return (
        <FullScreenLoadingIndicator style={styles.flex1} />
    )

Offline tests

  • Same as Tests

QA Steps

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • If we are not using the full Onyx data that we loaded, I've added the proper selector in order to ensure the component only re-renders when the data it is using changes
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Screen.Recording.2023-10-20.at.14.01.31.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
Screen.Recording.2023-10-20.at.11.31.49.mov
iOS: Native
Screen.Recording.2023-10-20.at.11.27.27.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
Screen.Recording.2023-10-20.at.11.30.43.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2023-10-20.at.11.30.15.mov
MacOS: Desktop
Screen.Recording.2023-10-20.at.11.24.08.mov

</View>
);
}

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should always define displayName:

Suggested change
FullScreenLoadingIndicator.displayName = 'FullScreenLoadingIndicator';

import themeColors from '../styles/themes/default';

type FullScreenLoadingIndicatorProps = {
style: Record<string, unknown> | Array<Record<string, unknown>>;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would consider more accurate type here:

Suggested change
style: Record<string, unknown> | Array<Record<string, unknown>>;
style: StyleProp<ViewStyle>

Copy link
Contributor

@fabioh8010 fabioh8010 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@MaciejSWM Please update the PR title to [TS migration] Migrate 'FullscreenLoadingIndicator.js' component to TypeScript, we should have this one tested by QA.

src/components/FullscreenLoadingIndicator.tsx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@MaciejSWM MaciejSWM changed the title [No QA][TS migration] Migrate FullscreenLoadingIndicator [TS migration] Migrate 'FullscreenLoadingIndicator.js' component to TypeScript Oct 25, 2023
Co-authored-by: Fábio Henriques <[email protected]>
@MaciejSWM MaciejSWM requested a review from fabioh8010 October 25, 2023 19:29
@MaciejSWM MaciejSWM marked this pull request as ready for review October 26, 2023 13:26
@MaciejSWM MaciejSWM requested a review from a team as a code owner October 26, 2023 13:26
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from cubuspl42 and removed request for a team October 26, 2023 13:26
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 26, 2023

@cubuspl42 Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]


function FullScreenLoadingIndicator({style}: FullScreenLoadingIndicatorProps) {
return (
<View style={[StyleSheet.absoluteFillObject, styles.fullScreenLoading, style]}>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hm, so passing a style array here just works? Was the old logic unnecessary?

const additionalStyles = _.isArray(props.style) ? props.style : [props.style];

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@MaciejSWM Let's ensure this change was intended

Copy link
Contributor Author

@MaciejSWM MaciejSWM Oct 27, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Turns out it works just fine. It's not only correct Typescript, but it also works when I test it with all the combinations of style:
http://localhost:8082/settings/profile/display-name
In DisplayNamePage.js (I renamed it to .tsx to highlight any errors, but none showed up):

{!props.isLoadingApp ? (
  <>
      <View style={{ height: '20%' }}>
          {/* No style */}
          <FullScreenLoadingIndicator />
      </View>
      <View style={{ height: '20%' }}>
          {/* Empty array style */}
          <FullScreenLoadingIndicator style={[]} />
      </View>
      <View style={{ height: '20%' }}>
          {/* Just one style */}
          <FullScreenLoadingIndicator style={styles.backgroundPurple} />
      </View>
      <View style={{ height: '20%' }}>
          {/* Array of styles */}
          <FullScreenLoadingIndicator style={[styles.backgroundPurple, styles.backgroundGold]} />
      </View>
  </>
) : (
image

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for verifying this!

@cubuspl42
Copy link
Contributor

We are over 1000 commits behind main; please merge it.

Even if there are no Git conflicts on the textual level, such diversion can:

  • create lint issues on main
  • result in bugs

In the case of this specific PR, we would probably get only a textual conflict (as it deletes a file), but 1000 commits is still a lot.

@cubuspl42
Copy link
Contributor

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
FullscreenLoadingIndicator-ts-web.mp4
Mobile Web - Chrome
FullscreenLoadingIndicator-ts-android-web-compressed.mp4
Mobile Web - Safari
FullscreenLoadingIndicator-ts-ios-web.mp4
Desktop
iOS
FullscreenLoadingIndicator-ts-ios.mp4
Android
FullscreenLoadingIndicator-ts-android-compressed.mp4

@MaciejSWM
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cubuspl42 thanks for pointing out valid concerns. Branch is up to date now + I addressed your question about getting rid of const additionalStyles = _.isArray(props.style) ? props.style : [props.style];

@MaciejSWM MaciejSWM requested a review from cubuspl42 October 27, 2023 13:13
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 30, 2023

We did not find an internal engineer to review this PR, trying to assign a random engineer to #25010 as well as to this PR... Please reach out for help on Slack if no one gets assigned!

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from AndrewGable October 30, 2023 08:07
Copy link
Contributor

@AndrewGable AndrewGable left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please write QA steps

@MaciejSWM
Copy link
Contributor Author

@AndrewGable updated

@MaciejSWM MaciejSWM requested a review from AndrewGable November 2, 2023 15:37
@AndrewGable AndrewGable merged commit a2bd366 into Expensify:main Nov 2, 2023
16 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Nov 2, 2023

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Nov 6, 2023

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/AndrewGable in version: 1.3.96-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Nov 9, 2023

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/puneetlath in version: 1.3.96-15 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 failure ❌
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/puneetlath in version: 1.3.97-7 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants