Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add “Reveal details” for the digital card #26778

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Oct 4, 2023

Conversation

JKobrynski
Copy link
Contributor

@JKobrynski JKobrynski commented Sep 5, 2023

Details

Fixed Issues

$ #22874
PROPOSAL: N/A

Tests

  1. Add the following code to InitialSettingsPage.js:
useEffect(() => {
    window.Onyx.merge(`cardList`, {
        'virtual': {
            cardID: 234523452345,
            state: 3,
            bank: 'Expensify',
            availableSpend:10000,
    domainName: 'Expensify',
    lastFourPAN: '',
    isVirtual: true,
    cardholderFirstName: "Test",
    cardholderLastName: "Test",
        }, 'physical': {
            cardID: 234523452345,
            state: 3,
            bank: '1000',
            availableSpend:10000,
    domainName: 'Expensify',
    lastFourPAN: '2345',
    isVirtual: false,
        },
    });

    Navigation.navigate(ROUTES.SETTINGS_WALLET_DOMAINCARDS.getRoute('expensify'));
}, []);
  1. Open the settings, you should be automatically navigated to the cards page
  2. Click the "Reveal Details" button
  3. You should see (mocked for now) details of the card
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

QA Steps

As of now it's not possible to test it without editing the code.

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • If we are not using the full Onyx data that we loaded, I've added the proper selector in order to ensure the component only re-renders when the data it is using changes
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
web.mov
Mobile Web - Chrome
chrome.webm
Mobile Web - Safari
safari.mp4
Desktop
desktop.mov
iOS
ios.mp4
Android
android.webm

src/components/MenuItem.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/languages/es.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@rezkiy37 rezkiy37 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Left comments.

@JKobrynski JKobrynski force-pushed the addRevealDetails branch 2 times, most recently from ebf11c5 to 400fa0c Compare September 26, 2023 08:33
Copy link
Contributor

@rezkiy37 rezkiy37 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Left a few comments.

src/pages/settings/Wallet/WalletPage/CardDetails.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/pages/settings/Wallet/WalletPage/CardDetails.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/components/MenuItem.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@JKobrynski JKobrynski marked this pull request as ready for review September 26, 2023 13:56
@JKobrynski JKobrynski requested a review from a team as a code owner September 26, 2023 13:56
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the request for review from a team September 26, 2023 13:56
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Sep 26, 2023

@jasperhuangg Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

src/pages/settings/Wallet/WalletPage/CardDetails.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/languages/en.ts Show resolved Hide resolved
src/pages/settings/Wallet/ExpensifyCardPage.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@grgia grgia self-requested a review September 27, 2023 05:01
@grgia
Copy link
Contributor

grgia commented Sep 29, 2023

Assigning @eVoloshchak for C+ review from issue

@grgia
Copy link
Contributor

grgia commented Oct 2, 2023

@eVoloshchak are you able to prioritize this PR?

usePrivatePersonalDetails();
const {translate} = useLocalize();

const handleCopyToClipboard = () => {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We can use CopyTextToClipboard instead
It will also add a hover effect to the copy icon and a tooltip, so it's consistent with the rest of the app

Screen.Recording.2023-10-02.at.11.13.49.mov

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Unfortunately it won't work for this UI, because CopyTextToClipboard displays a text component that we don't need as it's already displayed by MenuItemWithTopDescription. However, I found out that this would work:

<MenuItemWithTopDescription
    ...
    shouldShowRightComponent
    rightComponent={
        <PressableWithDelayToggle
            tooltipText={translate('reportActionContextMenu.copyToClipboard')}
            tooltipTextChecked={translate('reportActionContextMenu.copied')}
            icon={Expensicons.Copy}
            onPress={handleCopyToClipboard}
        />
    }
    ...
/>

So basically, a part of CopyTextToClipboard that displays the icon, what do you think?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Awesome, let's do that instead!

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done 😄


const formatted = addressItems.join(', ');

// Remove the last comma of the address
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think this is needed. join() doesn't add a separator string after the last element, I don't see a difference when commenting out this line

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am not sure I understand, you are saying we don't need join()? If we remove it, it will be an array

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I changed the implementation a lot, so I guess that comment might be outdated

function getFormattedAddress(privatePersonalDetails: OnyxTypes.PrivatePersonalDetails): string | null {
const {address} = privatePersonalDetails;
const [street1, street2] = (address?.street ?? '').split('\n');
const addressItems = [street1, street2, address?.city, address?.state, address?.zip, address?.country];
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If we don't have Address Line 2 populated, it just shows a blank space instead of filtering it out

image

Could we just re-use getFormattedAddress? Seems like both methods are supposed to be doing the same thing, we could move it to addressUtils (or similar) and use one method for both pages

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I changed it a little bit and moved it to PersonalDetailsUtils, let me know what you think!

@JKobrynski
Copy link
Contributor Author

@eVoloshchak MenuItem's misalignment is also fixed now 😄

@eVoloshchak
Copy link
Contributor

eVoloshchak commented Oct 2, 2023

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
Screen.Recording.2023-10-02.at.16.38.45.mov
Mobile Web - Chrome
screen-20231002-164043.mp4
Mobile Web - Safari
Screen.Recording.2023-10-02.at.16.41.17.mov
Desktop
Screen.Recording.2023-10-02.at.16.36.38.mov
iOS
Screen.Recording.2023-10-02.at.16.43.06.mov
Android
screen-20231002-164014.mp4

@eVoloshchak
Copy link
Contributor

Tests well on all the platforms, only a couple of things left

  • Am I correct in understanding the QA team won't be able to test this? If so, we should leave a message about this in QA tests section
  • There's a failing test, is it related to this PR?
  • I don't have access to the design doc so this might be by design, but shouldn't the icon be aligned vertically?
image

cc: @JKobrynski

@JKobrynski
Copy link
Contributor Author

  • Thanks, I updated the description
  • That failing test is not related to this PR,
    -About, the icon, looking at the design doc I am pretty sure it should be aligned vertically, I will adjust it

Screenshot 2023-10-03 at 08 57 10

@JKobrynski
Copy link
Contributor Author

@eVoloshchak icon aligned, should be fine now 😄

Copy link
Contributor

@eVoloshchak eVoloshchak left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 3, 2023

🎯 @eVoloshchak, thanks for reviewing and testing this PR! 🎉

An E/App issue has been created to issue payment here: #28704.

Comment on lines +88 to +90
pan="1234123412341234"
expiration="11/02/2024"
cvv="321"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks great, but could you add a quick comment that these will be replaced in this issue: https://github.com/orgs/Expensify/projects/58?pane=issue&itemId=33286617

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done!

@JKobrynski JKobrynski requested a review from grgia October 4, 2023 07:20
@JKobrynski JKobrynski mentioned this pull request Oct 4, 2023
59 tasks
Copy link
Contributor

@grgia grgia left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🎉 Fantastic work getting this done, thanks!

@grgia grgia merged commit fb9c763 into Expensify:main Oct 4, 2023
12 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Oct 4, 2023

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the DeployBlockerCash This issue or pull request should block deployment label Oct 4, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 4, 2023

Performance Comparison Report 📊

Significant Changes To Duration

Name Duration
App start TTI 1229.524 ms → 1347.327 ms (+117.803 ms, +9.6%) 🔴
App start runJsBundle 856.310 ms → 948.438 ms (+92.127 ms, +10.8%) 🔴
Show details
Name Duration
App start TTI Baseline
Mean: 1229.524 ms
Stdev: 37.079 ms (3.0%)
Runs: 1164.1744079999626 1172.8120639999397 1188.249265999999 1189.3406750001013 1193.484211999923 1193.828133000061 1194.5424130000174 1200.0925900000148 1200.7955009997822 1206.9100480000488 1214.0879330001771 1217.7798520000651 1218.6940279998817 1221.3226129999384 1222.3375479998067 1222.732245999854 1226.4161310000345 1227.4454259998165 1229.2176149999723 1229.7822320000269 1238.8710239999928 1247.2568350001238 1250.7805599998683 1258.4543429999612 1260.9412920000032 1263.1227370002307 1270.823522000108 1272.8209379999898 1296.5179099999368 1305.5594779998064 1316.0535109997727

Current
Mean: 1347.327 ms
Stdev: 39.654 ms (2.9%)
Runs: 1282.7187359998934 1288.859825000167 1296.0974409999326 1304.0765350000001 1305.889088000171 1309.3088449998759 1313.3015140001662 1318.8402049997821 1323.4211869998835 1327.7301679998636 1331.856935000047 1332.8473490001634 1334.7162480000407 1337.2477190000936 1337.5218409998342 1339.8263289998285 1346.2030259999447 1346.5919670001604 1348.2284670001827 1353.6262599998154 1355.670938000083 1361.0306040002033 1361.8385319998488 1368.323503000196 1378.158987000119 1384.766183000058 1385.9266070001759 1394.641077999957 1410.2257220000029 1436.90056299977 1450.7568290000781
App start runJsBundle Baseline
Mean: 856.310 ms
Stdev: 22.795 ms (2.7%)
Runs: 816 825 825 832 833 837 839 841 841 843 843 847 849 850 854 855 856 857 863 866 875 876 877 877 877 880 886 903 910

Current
Mean: 948.438 ms
Stdev: 30.861 ms (3.3%)
Runs: 881 894 909 915 916 919 920 922 925 927 929 934 934 941 941 943 956 958 962 964 964 969 970 970 973 974 978 979 980 985 1006 1012

Meaningless Changes To Duration

Show entries
Name Duration
Open Search Page TTI 622.906 ms → 637.765 ms (+14.860 ms, +2.4%)
App start regularAppStart 0.018 ms → 0.016 ms (-0.002 ms, -10.4%)
App start nativeLaunch 21.467 ms → 20.933 ms (-0.533 ms, -2.5%)
Show details
Name Duration
Open Search Page TTI Baseline
Mean: 622.906 ms
Stdev: 14.416 ms (2.3%)
Runs: 602.3069249996915 604.0179449999705 606.0804449999705 607.488078000024 611.4069009996019 612.2269700001925 612.7117110001855 612.9995120000094 613.5583089999855 615.1079920004122 615.6397710000165 615.9643149999902 618.778239000123 619.2261970001273 620.1538900001906 622.3103030002676 623.366415000055 626.3361409995705 629.1240239995532 630.5496020000428 631.9815679998137 632.0928549999371 636.2993169999681 636.4893809999339 636.5079350001179 637.3228760003112 638.282186999917 673.026815999765

Current
Mean: 637.765 ms
Stdev: 18.208 ms (2.9%)
Runs: 613.5685229999945 615.4754229998216 616.8902180003934 618.0074869999662 618.1687420001253 619.5573330000043 621.037434999831 621.3820809996687 623.2928470000625 625.5838629999198 626.5190429999493 628.715210000053 629.6542969997972 635.0021159998141 635.3189300000668 635.4621589998715 635.869752000086 638.2266839998774 640.2292080000043 642.4908039998263 643.659587000031 646.9155689999461 651.8899340000935 652.1963300001808 654.9607349997386 656.0131029998884 656.1495769997127 676.0111899999902 676.9815679998137 677.7309570000507
App start regularAppStart Baseline
Mean: 0.018 ms
Stdev: 0.002 ms (11.0%)
Runs: 0.015137000009417534 0.015218000393360853 0.015949999913573265 0.01599099999293685 0.01607300015166402 0.01635799976065755 0.016642999835312366 0.0166830001398921 0.0167239997535944 0.017212000209838152 0.017414999660104513 0.0174150001257658 0.017538000363856554 0.017659000121057034 0.017659000121057034 0.017862999811768532 0.01794400019571185 0.018391999881714582 0.018472999799996614 0.018716999795287848 0.018716999795287848 0.019084000028669834 0.019247000105679035 0.019328000023961067 0.01940999971702695 0.020589000079780817 0.021525000222027302 0.021850999910384417 0.02209499990567565 0.022948999889194965

Current
Mean: 0.016 ms
Stdev: 0.001 ms (5.2%)
Runs: 0.014891999773681164 0.015015000011771917 0.015177000313997269 0.01537999976426363 0.015420999843627214 0.015461999922990799 0.015503000002354383 0.015625 0.015705999918282032 0.015746999997645617 0.0157880000770092 0.015868999995291233 0.015951000154018402 0.015951000154018402 0.016113999765366316 0.016276000067591667 0.01631700014695525 0.01643799990415573 0.016561000142246485 0.016600999981164932 0.016844999976456165 0.016845999751240015 0.016887000296264887 0.016927000135183334 0.016966999974101782 0.017008000053465366 0.017212000209838152 0.01725299982354045 0.0176189998164773 0.017700999975204468 0.018554999958723783
App start nativeLaunch Baseline
Mean: 21.467 ms
Stdev: 2.473 ms (11.5%)
Runs: 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 20 20 20 20 20 20 21 21 21 22 22 22 22 22 23 23 23 24 25 26 27 28

Current
Mean: 20.933 ms
Stdev: 1.181 ms (5.6%)
Runs: 19 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 24 24

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 4, 2023

@Expensify/mobile-deployers 📣 Please look into this performance regression as it's a deploy blocker.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Oct 5, 2023

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/grgia in version: 1.3.78-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Oct 6, 2023

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/Beamanator in version: 1.3.78-4 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Oct 6, 2023

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/grgia in version: 1.3.79-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Oct 9, 2023

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/jasperhuangg in version: 1.3.79-5 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 failure ❌
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Oct 9, 2023

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/jasperhuangg in version: 1.3.79-5 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 cancelled 🔪
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Oct 9, 2023

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/jasperhuangg in version: 1.3.79-5 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
DeployBlockerCash This issue or pull request should block deployment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants