Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[HOLD for payment 2024-10-11] [HOLD for payment 2024-10-10] Bank account - Company website field appears empty on company info confirmation page #50086

Closed
2 of 6 tasks
IuliiaHerets opened this issue Oct 2, 2024 · 18 comments
Assignees
Labels
Awaiting Payment Auto-added when associated PR is deployed to production Bug Something is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager. Engineering Weekly KSv2

Comments

@IuliiaHerets
Copy link

IuliiaHerets commented Oct 2, 2024

If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email [email protected] to request to join our Slack channel!


Version Number: v9.0.43-1
Reproducible in staging?: Y
Reproducible in production?: Unable to validate in Prod because of Bank Setup
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail: https://expensify.testrail.io/index.php?/tests/view/5032805
Email or phone of affected tester (no customers): [email protected]
Issue reported by: Applause Internal Team

Action Performed:

Pre-requisite: with Expensifail account, user must have created a workspace and have enabled Workflows.

  1. Go to Settings > Workspaces > Workspace > Workflows.
  2. Click on "Connect bank account".
  3. Select "Connect online with Plaid", use Regions bank and testing credentials.
  4. Go trough the add bank account flow until you reach the Company info section.
  5. Keep going trough the flow, when you reach the company website page, leave it as it is and click "Next".
  6. Reach the confirmation page.

Expected Result:

Company website filed should be filled with default value on the confirmation page.

Actual Result:

Company website filed appears empty on the confirmation page.

Workaround:

Unknown

Platforms:

  • Android: Native
  • Android: mWeb Chrome
  • iOS: Native
  • iOS: mWeb Safari
  • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • MacOS: Desktop

Screenshots/Videos

Bug6622243_1727882739579.bandicam_2024-10-02_11-15-32-633.mp4

View all open jobs on GitHub

Issue OwnerCurrent Issue Owner: @mallenexpensify
@IuliiaHerets IuliiaHerets added DeployBlockerCash This issue or pull request should block deployment Daily KSv2 Bug Something is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager. DeployBlocker Indicates it should block deploying the API labels Oct 2, 2024
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 2, 2024

Triggered auto assignment to @pecanoro (DeployBlockerCash), see https://stackoverflowteams.com/c/expensify/questions/9980/ for more details.

Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 2, 2024

Triggered auto assignment to @mallenexpensify (Bug), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/14418 for more details. Please add this bug to a GH project, as outlined in the SO.

@github-actions github-actions bot added Engineering Hourly KSv2 and removed Daily KSv2 labels Oct 2, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 2, 2024

👋 Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive ⏱ issues! Check out the open `StagingDeployCash` deploy checklist to see the list of PRs included in this release, then work quickly to do one of the following:

  1. Identify the pull request that introduced this issue and revert it.
  2. Find someone who can quickly fix the issue.
  3. Fix the issue yourself.

@gijoe0295
Copy link
Contributor

Regression from #49957.

Remove the useEffect here got the default website value not being saved because the FormProvider wouldn't save default input value.

@jasperhuangg
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @gijoe0295, gonna get a revert up for that PR since it sounds like the proposal on that one is flawed.

@pecanoro
Copy link
Contributor

pecanoro commented Oct 2, 2024

I am reverting already 😄

@allgandalf
Copy link
Contributor

allgandalf commented Oct 2, 2024

We can close this issue once we CP the fix and re-test, this issue must be fixed now

@jasperhuangg
Copy link
Contributor

PR is on staging, asking for retest here

@kavimuru
Copy link

kavimuru commented Oct 2, 2024

Bug is not repro anymore

bandicam.2024-10-02.16-33-45-674.mp4

@pecanoro pecanoro closed this as completed Oct 2, 2024
@Gonals Gonals removed the DeployBlocker Indicates it should block deploying the API label Oct 2, 2024
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added Weekly KSv2 and removed Weekly KSv2 labels Oct 3, 2024
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added the Awaiting Payment Auto-added when associated PR is deployed to production label Oct 3, 2024
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot changed the title Bank account - Company website field appears empty on company info confirmation page [HOLD for payment 2024-10-10] Bank account - Company website field appears empty on company info confirmation page Oct 3, 2024
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the Reviewing Has a PR in review label Oct 3, 2024
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 3, 2024

Reviewing label has been removed, please complete the "BugZero Checklist".

Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 3, 2024

The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 9.0.43-6 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:

If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2024-10-10. 🎊

Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 3, 2024

BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:

  • [@pecanoro] The PR that introduced the bug has been identified. Link to the PR:
  • [@pecanoro] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake. Link to comment:
  • [@pecanoro] A discussion in #expensify-bugs has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner. Link to discussion:
  • [@pecanoro] Determine if we should create a regression test for this bug.
  • [@pecanoro] If we decide to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.
  • [@mallenexpensify] Link the GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon:

@mallenexpensify
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks, closing.
Posted on the other review and linked to this issue.

@jasperhuangg jasperhuangg removed the DeployBlockerCash This issue or pull request should block deployment label Oct 3, 2024
@allgandalf
Copy link
Contributor

@mallenexpensify i guess you reopened this issue instead of closing 😅

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added Weekly KSv2 and removed Weekly KSv2 labels Oct 4, 2024
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot changed the title [HOLD for payment 2024-10-10] Bank account - Company website field appears empty on company info confirmation page [HOLD for payment 2024-10-11] [HOLD for payment 2024-10-10] Bank account - Company website field appears empty on company info confirmation page Oct 4, 2024
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 4, 2024

The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 9.0.44-12 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:

If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2024-10-11. 🎊

Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 4, 2024

BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:

  • [@pecanoro] The PR that introduced the bug has been identified. Link to the PR:
  • [@pecanoro] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake. Link to comment:
  • [@pecanoro] A discussion in #expensify-bugs has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner. Link to discussion:
  • [@pecanoro] Determine if we should create a regression test for this bug.
  • [@pecanoro] If we decide to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.
  • [@mallenexpensify] Link the GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon:

@allgandalf
Copy link
Contributor

bump @mallenexpensify to close this one 🙇

@mallenexpensify
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @allgandalf , closing, for real....

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Awaiting Payment Auto-added when associated PR is deployed to production Bug Something is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager. Engineering Weekly KSv2
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

8 participants