-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[$250] LHN - Unread marker from second message when viewing conversation #46501
Comments
Triggered auto assignment to @puneetlath ( |
👋 Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive ⏱ issues! Check out the open `StagingDeployCash` deploy checklist to see the list of PRs included in this release, then work quickly to do one of the following:
|
We think that this bug might be related to #vip-vsp |
Just out of curiosity - why is the title in Russian ? |
@hannojg sorry, corrected |
Job added to Upwork: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~01b903d59d2cb795a3 |
Triggered auto assignment to Contributor-plus team member for initial proposal review - @rayane-djouah ( |
ProposalPlease re-state the problem that we are trying to solve in this issue.Conversation is displayed bold in LHN starting from second sent message What is the root cause of that problem?The condition here
scrollingVerticalOffset.current < MSG_VISIBLE_THRESHOLD . If that is true , we need to check reportAction.created > (userActiveSince.current ?? '') (or >= ) instead of reportAction.created < (userActiveSince.current ?? '') , because the former means that the report action is created after the user was active on the report, thus should be shown, and isWithinVisibleThreshold and subsequently shouldDisplay should be true
What changes do you think we should make in order to solve the problem?Update
What alternative solutions did you explore? (Optional) |
Confirmed that it's fixed by the revert 👍 |
@nkdengineer - The |
@hurali97 @mkhutornyi @grgia I've confirmed that this regression is caused by #45240 as suggested here |
Thanks @ishpaul777. Can you put your PR up for review? And I'll merge it and get it CPd. |
#46526 done! |
Hello, i read your job post for github issue. |
📣 @tJonPope727! 📣
|
Contributor details |
✅ Contributor details stored successfully. Thank you for contributing to Expensify! |
you have issues yet, please let me know. |
Confirmed that the revert/CP fixed it. Removing blocker labels. |
Am i eligible for payment for PR for this #46526 |
📣 @rayane-djouah 🎉 An offer has been automatically sent to your Upwork account for the Reviewer role 🎉 Thanks for contributing to the Expensify app! |
📣 @ishpaul777 🎉 An offer has been automatically sent to your Upwork account for the Contributor role 🎉 Thanks for contributing to the Expensify app! Offer link |
This is ready for payment @puneetlath : ) |
It looks like this is the PR: #45240 It was raised by @ishpaul777 and reviewed by @mkhutornyi, so both are due payment. Does that sound right? |
No, PR was #46526 and it was reviewed by you |
Oh I see. Well glad I asked then 😅 |
Paid. Thanks @ishpaul777! |
Paid. Thanks @ishpaul777! |
If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email [email protected] to request to join our Slack channel!
Version Number: 9.0.14-1
Reproducible in staging?: Y
Reproducible in production?: N
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail: https://expensify.testrail.io/index.php?/tests/view/4784111
Email or phone of affected tester (no customers): [email protected]
Issue reported by: Applause - Internal Team
Action Performed:
Expected Result:
Verify the unread marker is not displayed in the conversation history over the new messages
Verify the conversation is not bold in LHN
Actual Result:
Conversation is displayed bold in LHN starting from second sent message
Unread marker is displayed in the conversation history over messages once away and back to conversation
Workaround:
Unknown
Platforms:
Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?
Screenshots/Videos
Add any screenshot/video evidence
Bug6556882_1722303167988.video_14.mp4
View all open jobs on GitHub
Upwork Automation - Do Not Edit
Issue Owner
Current Issue Owner: @rayane-djouahThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: