Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

replace constant leaf mass per area (lma) #1254

Merged
merged 18 commits into from
Feb 11, 2021

Conversation

swensosc
Copy link
Contributor

@swensosc swensosc commented Jan 15, 2021

Description of changes

Replace hard code constant 0.25 for leaf mass per area with calculation based on parameter slatop (specific leaf area, top of canopy). Also move num_iter into loop over patches; currently it sits outside a loop, so p index is incorrect.

Also do some small answer changes in terms of new parameter files, and some other existing issues that have mild answer changes.

Specific notes

Contributors other than yourself, if any:

CTSM Issues Fixed (include github issue #):
Fixes #1256
Fixes #1268
Fixes #1262
Fixes #1261
Fixes #1256
Fixes #1255
Fixes #1252
Fixes #1184
Fixes #932
Fixes #478

Are answers expected to change (and if so in what way)? For Clm51 with BHS
yes. lma will be different from 0.25 and vary across pfts based on slatop. num_iter will be different b/c currently it is not within a patch loop.
clm5_0 non-Crop are different because of parameter file change
SOILWATER_10CM and TOTSOILLIQ change answers because they are summed later and after all updates in the field they operate on.

Any User Interface Changes (namelist or namelist defaults changes)? New params files

Testing performed, if any: regular testing

@ekluzek ekluzek self-assigned this Jan 15, 2021
@ekluzek ekluzek added tag: enh - new science enhancement new capability or improved behavior of existing capability labels Jan 15, 2021
@ekluzek ekluzek added this to the ctsm5.1.0 milestone Jan 15, 2021
@ekluzek ekluzek changed the title replace constant lma replace constant leaf mass per area (lma) Jan 15, 2021
Add heat stored in biomass (for trees and shrubs) to the surface energy balance calculation. Add
a switch for it and turn it on by default for clm5_1 physics. It's turned off for clm4_5, clm5_0
physics and when FATES is turned on. Those cases are identical to before, answers only change
when it's turned on.

Papers describing BHS simulations:
R. Meier, Davin, E., Swenson, S., Lawrence, D., and Schwaab, Jo. (2019). Biomass heat
storage dampens diurnal temperature variations
in forests. Environmental Research Letters. 14. 084026. 10.1088/1748-9326/ab2b4e.

S.C. Swenson, Burns, S. P., and Lawrence, D. M. ( 2019). The impact of biomass heat storage
on the canopy energy balance and atmospheric stability in the community land model, Journal
of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 11, 83– 98.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001476
@ekluzek
Copy link
Collaborator

ekluzek commented Jan 21, 2021

Since this updates param files let's fix #1184 as well.

@ekluzek
Copy link
Collaborator

ekluzek commented Jan 21, 2021

Also fix #478

…when spinup_state, having it only set in Restart was the problem
This brings fates_main_api into and up-to-date with ctsm master.
At the point of merge, fates_main_api was parallel with ctsm5.1.dev020,
only one tag behind ctsm master's head.

The purpose of this merge is to make all future updates to fates
on the ctsm master branch instead of on the fates_main_api branch.
…age as it's moved to the Summary routine (note also for validation I checked that answers stay the same for these variables if I use the previous version of HydrologyNoDrainage and comment out the sums in Summary and it does).
… use a created surface dataset with this version partial fix for ESCOMP#1252
@ekluzek ekluzek merged commit d4dd6c2 into ESCOMP:master Feb 11, 2021
@samsrabin samsrabin added the science Enhancement to or bug impacting science label Aug 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment