Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Snow fix #424

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from
Closed

Snow fix #424

wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

LenkaNovak
Copy link
Collaborator

Purpose

Closes #421


  • I have read and checked the items on the review checklist.

bors bot added a commit to CliMA/ClimaLand.jl that referenced this pull request Sep 19, 2023
330: make snow tests more comprehensive, fix bug r=kmdeck a=kmdeck

## Purpose 
Investigate conservation of energy and water for the bucket model due to issues seen in the Coupler
CliMA/ClimaCoupler.jl#424
CliMA/ClimaCoupler.jl#421



## To-do

## Content
- Add to test script for snow bucket conservation: run with nonzero precip, and with nonuniform evaporation field.
- Fix bug in heaviside function
- More care needed when tracking energy conservation. The energy in land is \rhoc_soil * \sum T_soil dz - \rho_l LH_f0*SWE. When snow falls on land, the energy changes because SWE changes, and we need to account for that in the test. This is not automatically accounted for because we dont have a snow energy variable (because we track SWE as the prognostic variable and the snow temperature is assumed to be the same as the freezing point).  We also do not track the energy in the water on land, so there is no contribution for liquid precip.

Review checklist

I have:
- followed the codebase contribution guide: https://clima.github.io/ClimateMachine.jl/latest/Contributing/
- followed the style guide: https://clima.github.io/ClimateMachine.jl/latest/DevDocs/CodeStyle/
- followed the documentation policy: https://github.com/CliMA/policies/wiki/Documentation-Policy
- checked that this PR does not duplicate an open PR.

In the Content, I have included 
- relevant unit tests, and integration tests, 
- appropriate docstrings on all functions, structs, and modules, and included relevant documentation.


----
- [X] I have read and checked the items on the review checklist.


Co-authored-by: kmdeck <[email protected]>
mitraA90 pushed a commit to CliMA/ClimaLand.jl that referenced this pull request Dec 22, 2023
330: make snow tests more comprehensive, fix bug r=kmdeck a=kmdeck

## Purpose 
Investigate conservation of energy and water for the bucket model due to issues seen in the Coupler
CliMA/ClimaCoupler.jl#424
CliMA/ClimaCoupler.jl#421



## To-do

## Content
- Add to test script for snow bucket conservation: run with nonzero precip, and with nonuniform evaporation field.
- Fix bug in heaviside function
- More care needed when tracking energy conservation. The energy in land is \rhoc_soil * \sum T_soil dz - \rho_l LH_f0*SWE. When snow falls on land, the energy changes because SWE changes, and we need to account for that in the test. This is not automatically accounted for because we dont have a snow energy variable (because we track SWE as the prognostic variable and the snow temperature is assumed to be the same as the freezing point).  We also do not track the energy in the water on land, so there is no contribution for liquid precip.

Review checklist

I have:
- followed the codebase contribution guide: https://clima.github.io/ClimateMachine.jl/latest/Contributing/
- followed the style guide: https://clima.github.io/ClimateMachine.jl/latest/DevDocs/CodeStyle/
- followed the documentation policy: https://github.com/CliMA/policies/wiki/Documentation-Policy
- checked that this PR does not duplicate an open PR.

In the Content, I have included 
- relevant unit tests, and integration tests, 
- appropriate docstrings on all functions, structs, and modules, and included relevant documentation.


----
- [X] I have read and checked the items on the review checklist.


Co-authored-by: kmdeck <[email protected]>
@LenkaNovak
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Parent issue already closed by #435

@LenkaNovak LenkaNovak closed this Apr 15, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Fix land snow
1 participant