Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Please add support for progress callbacks/resume upload/download #51

Closed
mamcx opened this issue Jun 26, 2012 · 3 comments
Closed

Please add support for progress callbacks/resume upload/download #51

mamcx opened this issue Jun 26, 2012 · 3 comments
Labels
feature-request This issue requires a new behavior in the product in order be resolved. Service Attention Workflow: This issue is responsible by Azure service team. Storage Storage Service (Queues, Blobs, Files)

Comments

@mamcx
Copy link

mamcx commented Jun 26, 2012

For build a more pleasant apps with python, will be great if support for progress reports (ie: say 1kb of 10mb up/down) and the ability to resume a broken up/down, agains a async callback
@weidongh
Copy link

weidongh commented Jul 5, 2012

Thanks for the comment. It would be a nice feature and we will consider to add it in the next release.

@huguesv
Copy link
Contributor

huguesv commented Jul 25, 2014

We have progress callbacks with the high-level blob functions now, but no ability to resume/retry.

@huguesv
Copy link
Contributor

huguesv commented May 26, 2015

We have retry functionality now.

@huguesv huguesv closed this as completed May 26, 2015
@bsiegel bsiegel added the Service Attention Workflow: This issue is responsible by Azure service team. label Sep 26, 2018
yunhaoling pushed a commit to yunhaoling/azure-sdk-for-python that referenced this issue Mar 25, 2019
@annatisch
Merge pull request Azure#51 from annatisch/eh_scenarios
97137ac 
EPH improvements
azclibot pushed a commit to azclibot/azure-sdk-for-python that referenced this issue Dec 23, 2021
@smile37773 @leonard520
@ninpan-ms @zhoufenqin
CodeGen from PR 17141 in Azure/azure-rest-api-specs
c3d5c7f 
[Hub Generated] Add Microsoft.AppPlatform/Spring new pricing tier on API version 2022-01-01-preview (Azure#17141)

* copy from last api version

* Add system data and example

* Add availability zones change

* Configuration Service

* Service Registry

* Gateway

* API portal

* App and Deployment

* BuildServices/Builds/Builders/BuildResults

* BuildPackBindings

* fix swagger of build service (Azure#43)

* fix swagger of build service

* fix

* fix: add agentPool in BuildProperties (Azure#44)

* Add fqdn in service resource (Azure#45)

Co-authored-by: Xiaoyun Ding <[email protected]>

* Change appName to appResourceId (Azure#46)

* Change appName to appResourceId

* fix

* Add resource id to connect resources

* Change operatorRuntimeState to resourceRequest (Azure#49)

* Change appName to appResourceId

* rename sourceGateways to gatewayIds

* Change operatorRuntimeState to resourceRequest

* feat: update agent pool swagger (Azure#50)

* Update 201 descriptions about header

* add get build (Azure#51)

* Remove 202 for PUT

* List and Get supportedBuildpacks

* set active deployment should be async

* Update setActiveDeployments response body

* ContentCertificateProperties.content should be secret

* Add jvmOptions for Jar type

Co-authored-by: Qingyi Liu <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Xiaoyun Ding <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Xiaoyun Ding <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: ninpan-ms <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: zhoufenqin <[email protected]>
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 13, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
feature-request This issue requires a new behavior in the product in order be resolved. Service Attention Workflow: This issue is responsible by Azure service team. Storage Storage Service (Queues, Blobs, Files)
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@bsiegel @mamcx @weidongh @huguesv