-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
suspicious uncovered code in _create_message (service bus __init__) #44
Comments
Verified as fixed. |
yunhaoling
pushed a commit
to yunhaoling/azure-sdk-for-python
that referenced
this issue
Mar 25, 2019
Stability improvements
azclibot
pushed a commit
to azclibot/azure-sdk-for-python
that referenced
this issue
Dec 23, 2021
[Hub Generated] Add Microsoft.AppPlatform/Spring new pricing tier on API version 2022-01-01-preview (Azure#17141) * copy from last api version * Add system data and example * Add availability zones change * Configuration Service * Service Registry * Gateway * API portal * App and Deployment * BuildServices/Builds/Builders/BuildResults * BuildPackBindings * fix swagger of build service (Azure#43) * fix swagger of build service * fix * fix: add agentPool in BuildProperties (Azure#44) * Add fqdn in service resource (Azure#45) Co-authored-by: Xiaoyun Ding <[email protected]> * Change appName to appResourceId (Azure#46) * Change appName to appResourceId * fix * Add resource id to connect resources * Change operatorRuntimeState to resourceRequest (Azure#49) * Change appName to appResourceId * rename sourceGateways to gatewayIds * Change operatorRuntimeState to resourceRequest * feat: update agent pool swagger (Azure#50) * Update 201 descriptions about header * add get build (Azure#51) * Remove 202 for PUT * List and Get supportedBuildpacks * set active deployment should be async * Update setActiveDeployments response body * ContentCertificateProperties.content should be secret * Add jvmOptions for Jar type Co-authored-by: Qingyi Liu <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Xiaoyun Ding <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Xiaoyun Ding <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: ninpan-ms <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: zhoufenqin <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
The second line in this code snippet is not covered according to code coverage result. If you know how to trigger it, please mention it here. If it ever gets executed, it will not work because broker_properties is incorrectly getting passed for the message_type parameter.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: