Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update healthcareapis #19510

Closed
wants to merge 9 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

peizhou298
Copy link

@peizhou298 peizhou298 commented Mar 13, 2021

All SDK Contribution checklist:

This checklist is used to make sure that common guidelines for a pull request are followed.

  • Please open PR in Draft mode if it is:
    • Work in progress or not intended to be merged.
    • Encountering multiple pipeline failures and working on fixes.
  • If an SDK is being regenerated based on a new swagger spec, a link to the pull request containing these swagger spec changes has been included above.
  • I have read the contribution guidelines.
  • The pull request does not introduce breaking changes.

General Guidelines and Best Practices

  • Title of the pull request is clear and informative.
  • There are a small number of commits, each of which have an informative message. This means that previously merged commits do not appear in the history of the PR. For more information on cleaning up the commits in your PR, see this page.

Testing Guidelines

  • Pull request includes test coverage for the included changes.

SDK Generation Guidelines

  • The generate.cmd file for the SDK has been updated with the version of AutoRest, as well as the commitid of your swagger spec or link to the swagger spec, used to generate the code. (Track 2 only)
  • The *.csproj and AssemblyInfo.cs files have been updated with the new version of the SDK. Please double check nuget.org current release version.

Additional management plane SDK specific contribution checklist:

Note: Only applies to Microsoft.Azure.Management.[RP] or Azure.ResourceManager.[RP]

  • Include updated management metadata.
  • Update AzureRP.props to add/remove version info to maintain up to date API versions.

Management plane SDK Troubleshooting

  • If this is very first SDK for a services and you are adding new service folders directly under /SDK, please add new service label and/or contact assigned reviewer.
  • If the check fails at the Verify Code Generation step, please ensure:
    • Do not modify any code in generated folders.
    • Do not selectively include/remove generated files in the PR.
    • Do use generate.ps1/cmd to generate this PR instead of calling autorest directly.
      Please pay attention to the @microsoft.csharp version output after running generate.ps1. If it is lower than current released version (2.3.82), please run it again as it should pull down the latest version,

Old outstanding PR cleanup

Please note:
If PRs (including draft) has been out for more than 60 days and there are no responses from our query or followups, they will be closed to maintain a concise list for our reviewers.

Copy link
Member

@m-nash m-nash left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you add the spec PR review associated with these changes

/// <param name="privateEndpointConnections">The list of private
/// endpoint connections that are set up for this resource.</param>
/// <param name="publicNetworkAccess">Control permission for data plane
/// traffic coming from public networks while private endpoint is
/// enabled. Possible values include: 'Enabled', 'Disabled'</param>
public ServicesProperties(string provisioningState = default(string), IList<ServiceAccessPolicyEntry> accessPolicies = default(IList<ServiceAccessPolicyEntry>), ServiceCosmosDbConfigurationInfo cosmosDbConfiguration = default(ServiceCosmosDbConfigurationInfo), ServiceAuthenticationConfigurationInfo authenticationConfiguration = default(ServiceAuthenticationConfigurationInfo), ServiceCorsConfigurationInfo corsConfiguration = default(ServiceCorsConfigurationInfo), ServiceExportConfigurationInfo exportConfiguration = default(ServiceExportConfigurationInfo), IList<PrivateEndpointConnection> privateEndpointConnections = default(IList<PrivateEndpointConnection>), string publicNetworkAccess = default(string))
public ServicesProperties(string provisioningState = default(string), IList<ServiceAccessPolicyEntry> accessPolicies = default(IList<ServiceAccessPolicyEntry>), ServiceCosmosDbConfigurationInfo cosmosDbConfiguration = default(ServiceCosmosDbConfigurationInfo), ServiceAuthenticationConfigurationInfo authenticationConfiguration = default(ServiceAuthenticationConfigurationInfo), ServiceCorsConfigurationInfo corsConfiguration = default(ServiceCorsConfigurationInfo), ServiceExportConfigurationInfo exportConfiguration = default(ServiceExportConfigurationInfo), ServiceAcrConfigurationInfo acrConfiguration = default(ServiceAcrConfigurationInfo), IList<PrivateEndpointConnection> privateEndpointConnections = default(IList<PrivateEndpointConnection>), string publicNetworkAccess = default(string))
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this will result in a breaking change, new parameters should be appended to the end

@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ public partial interface IPrivateEndpointConnectionsOperations
/// <exception cref="Microsoft.Rest.ValidationException">
/// Thrown when a required parameter is null
/// </exception>
Task<AzureOperationResponse<IEnumerable<PrivateEndpointConnection>>> ListByServiceWithHttpMessagesAsync(string resourceGroupName, string resourceName, Dictionary<string, List<string>> customHeaders = null, CancellationToken cancellationToken = default(CancellationToken));
Task<AzureOperationResponse<IEnumerable<PrivateEndpointConnectionDescription>>> ListByServiceWithHttpMessagesAsync(string resourceGroupName, string resourceName, Dictionary<string, List<string>> customHeaders = null, CancellationToken cancellationToken = default(CancellationToken));
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This name doesn't seem ideal given that "Description" typically refers to a human friendly sentence which describes something. It appears all we wanted to do was add SystemData to an existing model, can we explore adding this directly to the PrivateEndpointConnection object instead of creating a new type?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In my understanding, this code is generated automatically, change the code will cause the error in CI.

@peizhou298
Copy link
Author

peizhou298 commented Mar 15, 2021

Can you add the spec PR review associated with these changes

Azure/azure-rest-api-specs#12125

@m-nash
Copy link
Member

m-nash commented Mar 17, 2021

Added comments on the spec PR showing where the breaking change is coming from Azure/azure-rest-api-specs#12125 (review)

@allenjzhang
Copy link
Member

/azp run

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

You have several pipelines (over 10) configured to build pull requests in this repository. Specify which pipelines you would like to run by using /azp run [pipelines] command. You can specify multiple pipelines using a comma separated list.

@allenjzhang
Copy link
Member

/azp run net - mgmt - ci

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@peizhou298
Copy link
Author

peizhou298 commented Mar 30, 2021

Spec PR here Azure/azure-rest-api-specs@745f3e5

@m-nash
Copy link
Member

m-nash commented Mar 30, 2021

/check-enforcer evaluate

@peizhou298 peizhou298 requested a review from m-nash March 31, 2021 02:53
@peizhou298 peizhou298 marked this pull request as draft March 31, 2021 07:14
@ghost ghost added the no-recent-activity There has been no recent activity on this issue. label Jun 4, 2021
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jun 4, 2021

Hi @peizhou298. Thank you, for your interest in helping to improve the Azure SDK experience and for your contribution. We've noticed that there hasn't been recent engagement on this pull request. If this is still an active work stream, please let us know by pushing some changes or leaving a comment. Otherwise, we'll close this out in 7 days.

@ghost ghost closed this Jun 11, 2021
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jun 11, 2021

Hi @peizhou298. Thank you for your contribution. Since there hasn't been recent engagement, we're going to close this out. Feel free to respond with a comment containing "/reopen" if you'd like to continue working on these changes. Please be sure to use the command to reopen or remove the "no-recent-activity" label; otherwise, this is likely to be closed again with the next cleanup pass.

This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
breaking-change no-recent-activity There has been no recent activity on this issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants