Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add VMScaleSet ScaleIn Policy #7034

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Sep 9, 2019
Merged

Add VMScaleSet ScaleIn Policy #7034

merged 5 commits into from
Sep 9, 2019

Conversation

ashintre
Copy link
Member

@ashintre ashintre commented Aug 23, 2019

Adds VMScaleSet ScaleIn policy that is supported with the 2019-03-01 header but not included in Swagger

Latest improvements:

MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.

Contribution checklist:

  • I have reviewed the documentation for the workflow.
  • Validation tools were run on swagger spec(s) and have all been fixed in this PR.
  • The OpenAPI Hub was used for checking validation status and next steps.

ARM API Review Checklist

  • Service team MUST add the "WaitForARMFeedback" label if the management plane API changes fall into one of the below categories.
  • adding/removing APIs.
  • adding/removing properties.
  • adding/removing API-version.
  • adding a new service in Azure.

Failure to comply may result in delays for manifest application. Note this does not apply to data plane APIs.

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged urgently, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.
    Please follow the link to find more details on API review process.

Sorry, something went wrong.

Adds VMScaleSet ScaleIn policy that is supported with the 2019-03-01 header but not included in Swagger
@openapi-sdkautomation
Copy link

openapi-sdkautomation bot commented Aug 23, 2019

In Testing, Please Ignore

[Logs] (Generated from b9be4bd, Iteration 9)

Failed .NET: test-repo-billy/azure-sdk-for-net [Logs] [Diff]
Succeeded Python: test-repo-billy/azure-sdk-for-python [Logs] [Diff]
Failed Java: test-repo-billy/azure-sdk-for-java [Logs] [Diff]
  • Failed compute/resource-manager/v2017_03_30 [Logs]
  • Failed compute/resource-manager/v2017_09_01 [Logs]
  • Failed compute/resource-manager/v2017_12_01 [Logs]
  • Failed compute/resource-manager/v2018_04_01 [Logs]
Failed JavaScript: test-repo-billy/azure-sdk-for-js [Logs] [Diff]
In-Progress Go: test-repo-billy/azure-sdk-for-go [Logs] [Diff]
  • Warning compute/mgmt/2015-06-15 [Logs]
  • Warning compute/mgmt/2016-03-30 [Logs]
  • In-Progress compute/mgmt/2017-03-30 [Logs]
  • In-Progress compute/mgmt/2017-09-01 [Logs]
  • In-Progress compute/mgmt/2017-12-01 [Logs]
  • In-Progress compute/mgmt/2018-04-01 [Logs]
  • In-Progress compute/mgmt/2018-06-01 [Logs]
  • In-Progress compute/mgmt/2018-10-01 [Logs]
  • In-Progress compute/mgmt/2019-03-01 [Logs]
  • In-Progress compute/mgmt/2019-07-01 [Logs]
  • In-Progress containerservice/mgmt/2016-03-30 [Logs]
  • In-Progress containerservice/mgmt/2016-09-30 [Logs]
  • In-Progress containerservice/mgmt/2017-01-31 [Logs]
  • In-Progress preview/compute/mgmt/2016-04-30-preview [Logs]
  • In-Progress preview/containerservice/mgmt/2015-11-01-preview [Logs]
Succeeded Ruby: test-repo-billy/azure-sdk-for-ruby [Logs] [Diff]

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Aug 23, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-python

A PR has been created for you based on this PR content.

Once this PR will be merged, content will be added to your service PR:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-python#7011

@azuresdkci
Copy link
Contributor

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Aug 23, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-go

The initial PR has been merged into your service PR:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-go#5721

Fix whitespacing
Fix whitespace
Fix indentation
Fix indentation
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants