Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Adding change to support OcrSkillLanguage value of "unk" #16279

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 6, 2021
Merged

Adding change to support OcrSkillLanguage value of "unk" #16279

merged 2 commits into from
Oct 6, 2021

Conversation

gmndrg
Copy link
Contributor

@gmndrg gmndrg commented Oct 5, 2021 •
edited
Loading

MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.

Changelog

Add a changelog entry for this PR by answering the following questions:

  1. What's the purpose of the update?
    • new service onboarding
    • new API version
    • update existing version for new feature
    • update existing version to fix swagger quality issue in s360
    • Other, please clarify
  2. When are you targeting to deploy the new service/feature to public regions? Please provide the date or, if the date is not yet available, the month.
  3. When do you expect to publish the swagger? Please provide date or, the the date is not yet available, the month.
  4. If updating an existing version, please select the specific langauge SDKs and CLIs that must be refreshed after the swagger is published.
    • SDK of .NET (need service team to ensure code readiness)
    • SDK of Python
    • SDK of Java
    • SDK of Js
    • SDK of Go
    • PowerShell
    • CLI
    • Terraform
    • No refresh required for updates in this PR

Contribution checklist:

If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.

ARM API Review Checklist

Applicability: ⚠️

If your changes encompass only the following scenarios, you should SKIP this section, as these scenarios do not require ARM review.

  • Change to data plane APIs
  • Adding new properties
  • All removals

Otherwise your PR may be subject to ARM review requirements. Complete the following:

  • Check this box if any of the following apply to the PR so that label “WaitForARMFeedback” will be added automatically to begin ARM API Review. Failure to comply may result in delays to the manifest.

    • Adding a new service
    • Adding new API(s)
    • Adding a new API version
      -[ ] To review changes efficiently, ensure you copy the existing version into the new directory structure for first commit and then push new changes, including version updates, in separate commits.

  • Ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.

Breaking Change Review Checklist

If any of the following scenarios apply to the PR, request approval from the Breaking Change Review Board as defined in the Breaking Change Policy.

  • Removing API(s) in a stable version
  • Removing properties in a stable version
  • Removing API version(s) in a stable version
  • Updating API in a stable or public preview version with Breaking Change Validation errors
  • Updating API(s) in public preview over 1 year (refer to Retirement of Previews)

Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.

Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.

@openapi-workflow-bot
Copy link

Hi, @gmndrg Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips.

  • Please ensure to do self-check against checklists in first PR comment.
  • PR assignee is the person auto-assigned and responsible for your current PR reviewing and merging.
  • For specs comparison cross API versions, Use API Specs Comparison Report Generator
  • If there is CI failure(s), to fix CI error(s) is mandatory for PR merging; or you need to provide justification in PR comment for explanation. How to fix?

    • Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. [email protected]

    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    [Call for Action] To better understand Azure service dev/test scenario, and support Azure service developer better on Swagger and REST API related tests in early phase, please help to fill in with this survey https://aka.ms/SurveyForEarlyPhase. It will take 5 to 10 minutes. If you already complete survey, please neglect this comment. Thanks.

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Oct 5, 2021 •
    edited
    Loading

    Swagger Validation Report

    ️️✔️BreakingChange succeeded [Detail] [Expand] 
    There are no breaking changes.

    ️⚠️LintDiff: 0 Warnings warning [Detail]
    The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:
    Rule Message
    ⚠️ R2007 - LongRunningOperationsWithLongRunningExtension The operation 'Indexers_Run' returns 202 status code, which indicates a long running operation, please enable 'x-ms-long-running-operation.
    Location: Azure.Search/preview/2020-06-30-Preview/searchservice.json#L333
    ️️✔️Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand] 
    Validation passes for Avocado.
    ️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand] 
    Validation passes for ModelValidation.
    ️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand] 
    Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
    ️️✔️Cross-Version Breaking Changes succeeded [Detail] [Expand] 
    There are no breaking changes.
    ️️✔️CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand] 
    There is no credential detected.
    ️️✔️[Staging] SDK Track2 Validation succeeded [Detail] [Expand] 
    Validation passes for SDKTrack2Validation

    ️️✔️[Staging] PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand] 
    Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
    ️️✔️[Staging] SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand] 
    Validation passes for SpellCheck.
    ️️✔️[Staging] Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand] 
    Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Oct 5, 2021 •
    edited
    Loading

    Swagger Generation Artifacts

    ️️✔️[Staging] ApiDocPreview succeeded [Detail] [Expand] 
     Please click here to preview with your @microsoft account.
    ️️✔️[Staging] SDK Breaking Change Tracking succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

    Breaking Changes Tracking

    ️❌ azure-sdk-for-net-track2 failed [Detail]
    • ❌Failed [Logs]Release - Generate from 0a2fe04. SDK Automation 14.0.0 
      command	pwsh ./eng/scripts/Automation-Sdk-Init.ps1 ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/initOutput.json
warn	File azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/initOutput.json not found to read
command	pwsh ./eng/scripts/Automation-Sdk-Generate.ps1 ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/generateOutput.json
warn	No file changes detected after generation
error	Fatal error: packageFolderFromFileSearch not configured and could not be found in legacy config
packageFolderFromFileSearch not configured and could not be found in legacy config
Error: packageFolderFromFileSearch not configured and could not be found in legacy config
    at workflowDetectChangedPackages (/home/vsts/work/1/a/unified-pipeline-runtime/private/openapi-sdk-automation/lib/automation/workflow.js:422:23)
    at workflowHandleReadmeMd (/home/vsts/work/1/a/unified-pipeline-runtime/private/openapi-sdk-automation/lib/automation/workflow.js:168:11)
    at async Object.exports.workflowMain (/home/vsts/work/1/a/unified-pipeline-runtime/private/openapi-sdk-automation/lib/automation/workflow.js:83:9)
    at async Object.exports.sdkAutoMain (/home/vsts/work/1/a/unified-pipeline-runtime/private/openapi-sdk-automation/lib/automation/entrypoint.js:152:13)
    at async /home/vsts/work/1/a/unified-pipeline-runtime/private/openapi-sdk-automation/lib/cli/cli.js:20:18
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @Mohit-Chakraborty
    Copy link
    Contributor

    I am wondering if we have this support of auto-discovery of language by providing 'unk' in other skills that take language as input?

    @Mohit-Chakraborty Mohit-Chakraborty mentioned this pull request Oct 5, 2021
    Closed
    Mohit-Chakraborty
    Mohit-Chakraborty reviewed Oct 5, 2021
    View reviewed changes
    specification/search/data-plane/Azure.Search/preview/2020-06-30-Preview/searchservice.json Outdated
    },
    {
    "value": "unk",
    "description": "Unknown"
    Copy link
    Contributor

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    Can we add a longer description to explain the meaning of this special value.

    @gmndrg
    Copy link
    Contributor Author

    gmndrg commented Oct 5, 2021 via email

    @gmndrg
    Copy link
    Contributor Author

    gmndrg commented Oct 5, 2021 via email

    @gmndrg
    Copy link
    Contributor Author

    gmndrg commented Oct 5, 2021

    Tagging @lmazuel for merging purposes. SDK and Search Service approvals are in. Thank you.

    @jhendrixMSFT jhendrixMSFT merged commit 0a2fe04 into Azure:main Oct 6, 2021
    @Mohit-Chakraborty Mohit-Chakraborty mentioned this pull request Nov 16, 2021
    Merged
    25 tasks
    jovannikolov-msft pushed a commit to jovannikolov-msft/azure-rest-api-specs that referenced this pull request Dec 1, 2021
    @gmndrg @jovannikolov-msft
    Adding change to support OcrSkillLanguage value of "unk" (Azure#16279)
    8e25330 
    * Adding change to support OcrSkillLanguage value of "unk"

* Adding clarification about OcrSkillLanguage unk value.
    LeiWang3 pushed a commit to LeiWang3/azure-rest-api-specs that referenced this pull request Mar 31, 2022
    @gmndrg @LeiWang3
    Adding change to support OcrSkillLanguage value of "unk" (Azure#16279)
    9705e5d 
    * Adding change to support OcrSkillLanguage value of "unk"

* Adding clarification about OcrSkillLanguage unk value.
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Reviewers

    @jhendrixMSFT jhendrixMSFT jhendrixMSFT approved these changes

    @Mohit-Chakraborty Mohit-Chakraborty Mohit-Chakraborty approved these changes

    @bleroy bleroy bleroy approved these changes

    @AlexGhiondea AlexGhiondea Awaiting requested review from AlexGhiondea

    @arv100kri arv100kri Awaiting requested review from arv100kri arv100kri is a code owner

    @brjohnstmsft brjohnstmsft Awaiting requested review from brjohnstmsft

    Assignees

    @jhendrixMSFT jhendrixMSFT

    Labels
    None yet
    Projects
    None yet
    Milestone
    No milestone
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
    4 participants
    @gmndrg @Mohit-Chakraborty @bleroy @jhendrixMSFT