Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(simulator): use nullifier.value in client's pendingNullifier set so set.has() works #1534

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 11, 2023

Conversation

dbanks12
Copy link
Collaborator

Unfortunately this was not found via tests because tests are pending in this ticket #1242

Checklist:

Remove the checklist to signal you've completed it. Enable auto-merge if the PR is ready to merge.

  • If the pull request requires a cryptography review (e.g. cryptographic algorithm implementations) I have added the 'crypto' tag.
  • I have reviewed my diff in github, line by line and removed unexpected formatting changes, testing logs, or commented-out code.
  • Every change is related to the PR description.
  • I have linked this pull request to relevant issues (if any exist).

@dbanks12 dbanks12 merged commit a78daf7 into master Aug 11, 2023
@dbanks12 dbanks12 deleted the sb-db/pending-nullifier-set-fix branch August 11, 2023 18:00
codygunton pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 23, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants