Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

So sorry if I'm asking this in the wrong place, i just don't know on which repo i should ask on #45

Closed
itaysharir opened this issue Aug 3, 2022 · 3 comments

Comments

@itaysharir
Copy link

Is there an estimated time for when speaker and mic are going to be supported? It's the only thing stopping me from switching to Asahi. Thanks

@itaysharir itaysharir changed the title So sorry if I'm asking this in the wrong place, i just don't know on which repo i should ask. So sorry if I'm asking this in the wrong place, i just don't know on which repo i should ask on. Aug 3, 2022
@itaysharir itaysharir changed the title So sorry if I'm asking this in the wrong place, i just don't know on which repo i should ask on. So sorry if I'm asking this in the wrong place, i just don't know on which repo i should ask on\ Aug 3, 2022
@itaysharir itaysharir changed the title So sorry if I'm asking this in the wrong place, i just don't know on which repo i should ask on\ So sorry if I'm asking this in the wrong place, i just don't know on which repo i should ask on Aug 3, 2022
@malarquis
Copy link

I believe this is where they try to keep updates on feature support. Or maybe try asking on IRC?

@Willmish
Copy link

Willmish commented Aug 4, 2022

Mic i am not sure, regarding speakers, like @lomichael mentioned more info on that page (full explanation here: https://github.com/AsahiLinux/docs/wiki/Feature-Support#speakers)

TLDR: speaker drivers are in place, but disabled to not blow them (need some safety features added to limit max signal)

@marcan
Copy link
Member

marcan commented Sep 9, 2022

Please do not file GitHub issues for random questions or not-yet-supported hardware, and please do not ask for ETAs. If everyone does that, it just waste everyone's time. Hardware support will come when it's ready.

@marcan marcan closed this as completed Sep 9, 2022
marcan pushed a commit that referenced this issue Sep 22, 2022
When use 'echo c > /proc/sysrq-trigger' to trigger kdump, riscv_crash_save_regs()
will be called to save regs for vmcore, we found "epc" value 00ffffffa5537400
is not a valid kernel virtual address, but is a user virtual address. Other
regs(eg, ra, sp, gp...) are correct kernel virtual address.
Actually 0x00ffffffb0dd9400 is the user mode PC of 'PID: 113 Comm: sh', which
is saved in the task's stack.

[   21.201701] CPU: 0 PID: 113 Comm: sh Kdump: loaded Not tainted 5.18.9 #45
[   21.201979] Hardware name: riscv-virtio,qemu (DT)
[   21.202160] epc : 00ffffffa5537400 ra : ffffffff80088640 sp : ff20000010333b90
[   21.202435]  gp : ffffffff810dde38 tp : ff6000000226c200 t0 : ffffffff8032be7c
[   21.202707]  t1 : 0720072007200720 t2 : 30203a7375746174 s0 : ff20000010333cf0
[   21.202973]  s1 : 0000000000000000 a0 : ff20000010333b98 a1 : 0000000000000001
[   21.203243]  a2 : 0000000000000010 a3 : 0000000000000000 a4 : 28c8f0aeffea4e00
[   21.203519]  a5 : 28c8f0aeffea4e00 a6 : 0000000000000009 a7 : ffffffff8035c9b8
[   21.203794]  s2 : ffffffff810df0a8 s3 : ffffffff810df718 s4 : ff20000010333b98
[   21.204062]  s5 : 0000000000000000 s6 : 0000000000000007 s7 : ffffffff80c4a468
[   21.204331]  s8 : 00ffffffef451410 s9 : 0000000000000007 s10: 00aaaaaac0510700
[   21.204606]  s11: 0000000000000001 t3 : ff60000001218f00 t4 : ff60000001218f00
[   21.204876]  t5 : ff60000001218000 t6 : ff200000103338b8
[   21.205079] status: 0000000200000020 badaddr: 0000000000000000 cause: 0000000000000008

With the incorrect PC, the backtrace showed by crash tool as below, the first
stack frame is abnormal,

crash> bt
PID: 113      TASK: ff60000002269600  CPU: 0    COMMAND: "sh"
 #0 [ff2000001039bb90] __efistub_.Ldebug_info0 at 00ffffffa5537400 <-- Abnormal
 #1 [ff2000001039bcf0] panic at ffffffff806578ba
 #2 [ff2000001039bd50] sysrq_reset_seq_param_set at ffffffff8038c030
 #3 [ff2000001039bda0] __handle_sysrq at ffffffff8038c5f8
 #4 [ff2000001039be00] write_sysrq_trigger at ffffffff8038cad8
 #5 [ff2000001039be20] proc_reg_write at ffffffff801b7edc
 #6 [ff2000001039be40] vfs_write at ffffffff80152ba6
 #7 [ff2000001039be80] ksys_write at ffffffff80152ece
 #8 [ff2000001039bed0] sys_write at ffffffff80152f46

With the patch, we can get current kernel mode PC, the output as below,

[   17.607658] CPU: 0 PID: 113 Comm: sh Kdump: loaded Not tainted 5.18.9 #42
[   17.607937] Hardware name: riscv-virtio,qemu (DT)
[   17.608150] epc : ffffffff800078f8 ra : ffffffff8008862c sp : ff20000010333b90
[   17.608441]  gp : ffffffff810dde38 tp : ff6000000226c200 t0 : ffffffff8032be68
[   17.608741]  t1 : 0720072007200720 t2 : 666666666666663c s0 : ff20000010333cf0
[   17.609025]  s1 : 0000000000000000 a0 : ff20000010333b98 a1 : 0000000000000001
[   17.609320]  a2 : 0000000000000010 a3 : 0000000000000000 a4 : 0000000000000000
[   17.609601]  a5 : ff60000001c78000 a6 : 000000000000003c a7 : ffffffff8035c9a4
[   17.609894]  s2 : ffffffff810df0a8 s3 : ffffffff810df718 s4 : ff20000010333b98
[   17.610186]  s5 : 0000000000000000 s6 : 0000000000000007 s7 : ffffffff80c4a468
[   17.610469]  s8 : 00ffffffca281410 s9 : 0000000000000007 s10: 00aaaaaab5bb6700
[   17.610755]  s11: 0000000000000001 t3 : ff60000001218f00 t4 : ff60000001218f00
[   17.611041]  t5 : ff60000001218000 t6 : ff20000010333988
[   17.611255] status: 0000000200000020 badaddr: 0000000000000000 cause: 0000000000000008

With the correct PC, the backtrace showed by crash tool as below,

crash> bt
PID: 113      TASK: ff6000000226c200  CPU: 0    COMMAND: "sh"
 #0 [ff20000010333b90] riscv_crash_save_regs at ffffffff800078f8 <--- Normal
 #1 [ff20000010333cf0] panic at ffffffff806578c6
 #2 [ff20000010333d50] sysrq_reset_seq_param_set at ffffffff8038c03c
 #3 [ff20000010333da0] __handle_sysrq at ffffffff8038c604
 #4 [ff20000010333e00] write_sysrq_trigger at ffffffff8038cae4
 #5 [ff20000010333e20] proc_reg_write at ffffffff801b7ee8
 #6 [ff20000010333e40] vfs_write at ffffffff80152bb2
 #7 [ff20000010333e80] ksys_write at ffffffff80152eda
 #8 [ff20000010333ed0] sys_write at ffffffff80152f52

Fixes: e53d281 ("RISC-V: Add kdump support")
Co-developed-by: Guo Ren <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Xianting Tian <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]>
WhatAmISupposedToPutHere pushed a commit to WhatAmISupposedToPutHere/linux that referenced this issue Nov 4, 2022
On x86, prior to ("mm: handle uninitialized numa nodes gracecully"), NUMA
nodes could be allocated at three different places.

- numa_register_memblks
- init_cpu_to_node
- init_gi_nodes

All these calls happen at setup_arch, and have the following order:

setup_arch
  ...
  x86_numa_init
   numa_init
    numa_register_memblks
  ...
  init_cpu_to_node
   init_memory_less_node
    alloc_node_data
    free_area_init_memoryless_node
  init_gi_nodes
   init_memory_less_node
    alloc_node_data
    free_area_init_memoryless_node

numa_register_memblks() is only interested in those nodes which have
memory, so it skips over any memoryless node it founds.  Later on, when we
have read ACPI's SRAT table, we call init_cpu_to_node() and
init_gi_nodes(), which initialize any memoryless node we might have that
have either CPU or Initiator affinity, meaning we allocate pg_data_t
struct for them and we mark them as ONLINE.

So far so good, but the thing is that after ("mm: handle uninitialized
numa nodes gracefully"), we allocate all possible NUMA nodes in
free_area_init(), meaning we have a picture like the following:

setup_arch
  x86_numa_init
   numa_init
    numa_register_memblks  <-- allocate non-memoryless node
  x86_init.paging.pagetable_init
   ...
    free_area_init
     free_area_init_memoryless <-- allocate memoryless node
  init_cpu_to_node
   alloc_node_data             <-- allocate memoryless node with CPU
   free_area_init_memoryless_node
  init_gi_nodes
   alloc_node_data             <-- allocate memoryless node with Initiator
   free_area_init_memoryless_node

free_area_init() already allocates all possible NUMA nodes, but
init_cpu_to_node() and init_gi_nodes() are clueless about that, so they go
ahead and allocate a new pg_data_t struct without checking anything,
meaning we end up allocating twice.

It should be mad clear that this only happens in the case where memoryless
NUMA node happens to have a CPU/Initiator affinity.

So get rid of init_memory_less_node() and just set the node online.

Note that setting the node online is needed, otherwise we choke down the
chain when bringup_nonboot_cpus() ends up calling
__try_online_node()->register_one_node()->...  and we blow up in
bus_add_device().  As can be seen here:

==========
[    0.585060] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000060
[    0.586091] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
[    0.586831] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
[    0.586930] PGD 0 P4D 0
[    0.586930] Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC PTI
[    0.586930] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.17.0-rc4-1-default+ AsahiLinux#45
[    0.586930] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.0.0-prebuilt.qemu-project.org 04/4
[    0.586930] RIP: 0010:bus_add_device+0x5a/0x140
[    0.586930] Code: 8b 74 24 20 48 89 df e8 84 96 ff ff 85 c0 89 c5 75 38 48 8b 53 50 48 85 d2 0f 84 bb 00 004
[    0.586930] RSP: 0000:ffffc9000022bd10 EFLAGS: 00010246
[    0.586930] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff888100987400 RCX: ffff8881003e4e19
[    0.586930] RDX: ffff8881009a5e00 RSI: ffff888100987400 RDI: ffff888100987400
[    0.586930] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: ffff8881003e4e18 R09: ffff8881003e4c98
[    0.586930] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: ffff888100402bc0 R12: ffffffff822ceba0
[    0.586930] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff888100987400 R15: 0000000000000000
[    0.586930] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88853fc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[    0.586930] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[    0.586930] CR2: 0000000000000060 CR3: 000000000200a001 CR4: 00000000001706b0
[    0.586930] Call Trace:
[    0.586930]  <TASK>
[    0.586930]  device_add+0x4c0/0x910
[    0.586930]  __register_one_node+0x97/0x2d0
[    0.586930]  __try_online_node+0x85/0xc0
[    0.586930]  try_online_node+0x25/0x40
[    0.586930]  cpu_up+0x4f/0x100
[    0.586930]  bringup_nonboot_cpus+0x4f/0x60
[    0.586930]  smp_init+0x26/0x79
[    0.586930]  kernel_init_freeable+0x130/0x2f1
[    0.586930]  ? rest_init+0x100/0x100
[    0.586930]  kernel_init+0x17/0x150
[    0.586930]  ? rest_init+0x100/0x100
[    0.586930]  ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
[    0.586930]  </TASK>
[    0.586930] Modules linked in:
[    0.586930] CR2: 0000000000000060
[    0.586930] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
==========

The reason is simple, by the time bringup_nonboot_cpus() gets called, we
did not register the node_subsys bus yet, so we crash when
bus_add_device() tries to dereference bus()->p.

The following shows the order of the calls:

kernel_init_freeable
 smp_init
  bringup_nonboot_cpus
   ...
     bus_add_device()      <- we did not register node_subsys yet
 do_basic_setup
  do_initcalls
   postcore_initcall(register_node_type);
    register_node_type
     subsys_system_register
      subsys_register
       bus_register         <- register node_subsys bus

Why setting the node online saves us then?  Well, simply because
__try_online_node() backs off when the node is online, meaning we do not
end up calling register_one_node() in the first place.

This is subtle, broken and deserves a deep analysis and thought about how
to put this into shape, but for now let us have this easy fix for the
leaking memory issue.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Fixes: da4490c ("mm: handle uninitialized numa nodes gracefully")
Signed-off-by: Oscar Salvador <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <[email protected]>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <[email protected]>
Cc: Rafael Aquini <[email protected]>
Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
Cc: Wei Yang <[email protected]>
Cc: Dennis Zhou <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexey Makhalov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]>
dberlin pushed a commit to dberlin/linux that referenced this issue Oct 27, 2023
commit 503930f upstream.

rtnl_offload_xstats_get_size_hw_s_info_one() conditionalizes the
size-computation for IFLA_OFFLOAD_XSTATS_HW_S_INFO_USED based on whether
or not the device has offload_xstats enabled.

However, rtnl_offload_xstats_fill_hw_s_info_one() is adding the u8 for
that field uncondtionally.

syzkaller triggered a WARNING in rtnl_stats_get due to this:
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 754 at net/core/rtnetlink.c:5982 rtnl_stats_get+0x2f4/0x300
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 PID: 754 Comm: syz-executor148 Not tainted 6.6.0-rc2-g331b78eb12af AsahiLinux#45
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.11.0-2.el7 04/01/2014
RIP: 0010:rtnl_stats_get+0x2f4/0x300 net/core/rtnetlink.c:5982
Code: ff ff 89 ee e8 7d 72 50 ff 83 fd a6 74 17 e8 33 6e 50 ff 4c 89 ef be 02 00 00 00 e8 86 00 fa ff e9 7b fe ff ff e8 1c 6e 50 ff <0f> 0b eb e5 e8 73 79 7b 00 0f 1f 00 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
RSP: 0018:ffffc900006837c0 EFLAGS: 00010293
RAX: ffffffff81cf7f24 RBX: ffff8881015d9000 RCX: ffff888101815a00
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00000000ffffffa6 RDI: 00000000ffffffa6
RBP: 00000000ffffffa6 R08: ffffffff81cf7f03 R09: 0000000000000001
R10: ffff888101ba47b9 R11: ffff888101815a00 R12: ffff8881017dae00
R13: ffff8881017dad00 R14: ffffc90000683ab8 R15: ffffffff83c1f740
FS:  00007fbc22dbc740(0000) GS:ffff88813bc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000000020000046 CR3: 000000010264e003 CR4: 0000000000170ef0
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x677/0x710 net/core/rtnetlink.c:6480
 netlink_rcv_skb+0xea/0x1c0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2545
 netlink_unicast+0x430/0x500 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1342
 netlink_sendmsg+0x4fc/0x620 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1910
 sock_sendmsg+0xa8/0xd0 net/socket.c:730
 ____sys_sendmsg+0x22a/0x320 net/socket.c:2541
 ___sys_sendmsg+0x143/0x190 net/socket.c:2595
 __x64_sys_sendmsg+0xd8/0x150 net/socket.c:2624
 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
 do_syscall_64+0x47/0xa0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8
RIP: 0033:0x7fbc22e8d6a9
Code: 5c c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 4f 37 0d 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007ffc4320e778 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002e
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000004007d0 RCX: 00007fbc22e8d6a9
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000020000000 RDI: 0000000000000003
RBP: 0000000000000001 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00000000004007d0
R10: 0000000000000008 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007ffc4320e898
R13: 00007ffc4320e8a8 R14: 00000000004004a0 R15: 00007fbc22fa5a80
 </TASK>
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

Which didn't happen prior to commit bf9f1ba ("net: add dedicated
kmem_cache for typical/small skb->head") as the skb always was large
enough.

Fixes: 0e7788f ("net: rtnetlink: Add UAPI for obtaining L3 offload xstats")
Signed-off-by: Christoph Paasch <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Petr Machata <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
marcan pushed a commit that referenced this issue Nov 19, 2023
rtnl_offload_xstats_get_size_hw_s_info_one() conditionalizes the
size-computation for IFLA_OFFLOAD_XSTATS_HW_S_INFO_USED based on whether
or not the device has offload_xstats enabled.

However, rtnl_offload_xstats_fill_hw_s_info_one() is adding the u8 for
that field uncondtionally.

syzkaller triggered a WARNING in rtnl_stats_get due to this:
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 754 at net/core/rtnetlink.c:5982 rtnl_stats_get+0x2f4/0x300
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 PID: 754 Comm: syz-executor148 Not tainted 6.6.0-rc2-g331b78eb12af #45
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.11.0-2.el7 04/01/2014
RIP: 0010:rtnl_stats_get+0x2f4/0x300 net/core/rtnetlink.c:5982
Code: ff ff 89 ee e8 7d 72 50 ff 83 fd a6 74 17 e8 33 6e 50 ff 4c 89 ef be 02 00 00 00 e8 86 00 fa ff e9 7b fe ff ff e8 1c 6e 50 ff <0f> 0b eb e5 e8 73 79 7b 00 0f 1f 00 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
RSP: 0018:ffffc900006837c0 EFLAGS: 00010293
RAX: ffffffff81cf7f24 RBX: ffff8881015d9000 RCX: ffff888101815a00
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00000000ffffffa6 RDI: 00000000ffffffa6
RBP: 00000000ffffffa6 R08: ffffffff81cf7f03 R09: 0000000000000001
R10: ffff888101ba47b9 R11: ffff888101815a00 R12: ffff8881017dae00
R13: ffff8881017dad00 R14: ffffc90000683ab8 R15: ffffffff83c1f740
FS:  00007fbc22dbc740(0000) GS:ffff88813bc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000000020000046 CR3: 000000010264e003 CR4: 0000000000170ef0
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x677/0x710 net/core/rtnetlink.c:6480
 netlink_rcv_skb+0xea/0x1c0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2545
 netlink_unicast+0x430/0x500 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1342
 netlink_sendmsg+0x4fc/0x620 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1910
 sock_sendmsg+0xa8/0xd0 net/socket.c:730
 ____sys_sendmsg+0x22a/0x320 net/socket.c:2541
 ___sys_sendmsg+0x143/0x190 net/socket.c:2595
 __x64_sys_sendmsg+0xd8/0x150 net/socket.c:2624
 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
 do_syscall_64+0x47/0xa0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8
RIP: 0033:0x7fbc22e8d6a9
Code: 5c c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 4f 37 0d 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007ffc4320e778 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002e
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000004007d0 RCX: 00007fbc22e8d6a9
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000020000000 RDI: 0000000000000003
RBP: 0000000000000001 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00000000004007d0
R10: 0000000000000008 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007ffc4320e898
R13: 00007ffc4320e8a8 R14: 00000000004004a0 R15: 00007fbc22fa5a80
 </TASK>
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

Which didn't happen prior to commit bf9f1ba ("net: add dedicated
kmem_cache for typical/small skb->head") as the skb always was large
enough.

Fixes: 0e7788f ("net: rtnetlink: Add UAPI for obtaining L3 offload xstats")
Signed-off-by: Christoph Paasch <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Petr Machata <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
marcan pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jan 19, 2024
After the blamed commit below, the TCP sockets (and the MPTCP subflows)
can build egress packets larger than 64K. That exceeds the maximum DSS
data size, the length being misrepresent on the wire and the stream being
corrupted, as later observed on the receiver:

  WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 9696 at net/mptcp/protocol.c:705 __mptcp_move_skbs_from_subflow+0x2604/0x26e0
  CPU: 0 PID: 9696 Comm: syz-executor.7 Not tainted 6.6.0-rc5-gcd8bdf563d46 #45
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.11.0-2.el7 04/01/2014
  netlink: 8 bytes leftover after parsing attributes in process `syz-executor.4'.
  RIP: 0010:__mptcp_move_skbs_from_subflow+0x2604/0x26e0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:705
  RSP: 0018:ffffc90000006e80 EFLAGS: 00010246
  RAX: ffffffff83e9f674 RBX: ffff88802f45d870 RCX: ffff888102ad0000
  netlink: 8 bytes leftover after parsing attributes in process `syz-executor.4'.
  RDX: 0000000080000303 RSI: 0000000000013908 RDI: 0000000000003908
  RBP: ffffc90000007110 R08: ffffffff83e9e078 R09: 1ffff1100e548c8a
  R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: ffffed100e548c8b R12: 0000000000013908
  R13: dffffc0000000000 R14: 0000000000003908 R15: 000000000031cf29
  FS:  00007f239c47e700(0000) GS:ffff88811b200000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
  CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
  CR2: 00007f239c45cd78 CR3: 000000006a66c006 CR4: 0000000000770ef0
  DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
  DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000600
  PKRU: 55555554
  Call Trace:
   <IRQ>
   mptcp_data_ready+0x263/0xac0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:819
   subflow_data_ready+0x268/0x6d0 net/mptcp/subflow.c:1409
   tcp_data_queue+0x21a1/0x7a60 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:5151
   tcp_rcv_established+0x950/0x1d90 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:6098
   tcp_v6_do_rcv+0x554/0x12f0 net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c:1483
   tcp_v6_rcv+0x2e26/0x3810 net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c:1749
   ip6_protocol_deliver_rcu+0xd6b/0x1ae0 net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:438
   ip6_input+0x1c5/0x470 net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:483
   ipv6_rcv+0xef/0x2c0 include/linux/netfilter.h:304
   __netif_receive_skb+0x1ea/0x6a0 net/core/dev.c:5532
   process_backlog+0x353/0x660 net/core/dev.c:5974
   __napi_poll+0xc6/0x5a0 net/core/dev.c:6536
   net_rx_action+0x6a0/0xfd0 net/core/dev.c:6603
   __do_softirq+0x184/0x524 kernel/softirq.c:553
   do_softirq+0xdd/0x130 kernel/softirq.c:454

Address the issue explicitly bounding the maximum GSO size to what MPTCP
actually allows.

Reported-by: Christoph Paasch <[email protected]>
Closes: multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next#450
Fixes: 7c4e983 ("net: allow gso_max_size to exceed 65536")
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231114-upstream-net-20231113-mptcp-misc-fixes-6-7-rc2-v1-1-7b9cd6a7b7f4@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
WhatAmISupposedToPutHere pushed a commit to WhatAmISupposedToPutHere/linux that referenced this issue Oct 30, 2024
commit 829e0c9 upstream.

There is another found exception that the "timerlat/1" thread was
scheduled on CPU0, and lead to timer corruption finally:

```
ODEBUG: init active (active state 0) object: ffff888237c2e108 object type: hrtimer hint: timerlat_irq+0x0/0x220
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 426 at lib/debugobjects.c:518 debug_print_object+0x7d/0xb0
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 426 Comm: timerlat/1 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc7+ AsahiLinux#45
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014
RIP: 0010:debug_print_object+0x7d/0xb0
...
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 ? __warn+0x7c/0x110
 ? debug_print_object+0x7d/0xb0
 ? report_bug+0xf1/0x1d0
 ? prb_read_valid+0x17/0x20
 ? handle_bug+0x3f/0x70
 ? exc_invalid_op+0x13/0x60
 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20
 ? debug_print_object+0x7d/0xb0
 ? debug_print_object+0x7d/0xb0
 ? __pfx_timerlat_irq+0x10/0x10
 __debug_object_init+0x110/0x150
 hrtimer_init+0x1d/0x60
 timerlat_main+0xab/0x2d0
 ? __pfx_timerlat_main+0x10/0x10
 kthread+0xb7/0xe0
 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
 ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x40
 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
 </TASK>
```

After tracing the scheduling event, it was discovered that the migration
of the "timerlat/1" thread was performed during thread creation. Further
analysis confirmed that it is because the CPU online processing for
osnoise is implemented through workers, which is asynchronous with the
offline processing. When the worker was scheduled to create a thread, the
CPU may has already been removed from the cpu_online_mask during the offline
process, resulting in the inability to select the right CPU:

T1                       | T2
[CPUHP_ONLINE]           | cpu_device_down()
osnoise_hotplug_workfn() |
                         |     cpus_write_lock()
                         |     takedown_cpu(1)
                         |     cpus_write_unlock()
[CPUHP_OFFLINE]          |
    cpus_read_lock()     |
    start_kthread(1)     |
    cpus_read_unlock()   |

To fix this, skip online processing if the CPU is already offline.

Cc: [email protected]
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <[email protected]>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/[email protected]
Fixes: c8895e2 ("trace/osnoise: Support hotplug operations")
Signed-off-by: Wei Li <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants