You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Adding more children that are identical(ish) to the actual first sibling results in even more elements in the final array. Correct me if I’m wrong, but that shouldn’t be the case. In addition :nth-child(1) is not special, this also happens for other values of the pseudo-selector.
Ensure that the `:nth-child`/`:nth-of-type` selectors find siblings
through the `Core.:(===)` operator. This is the same behaviour as
`nextSibling` and `prevSibling`.
ClosesAlgocircle#21.
I have managed to reduce the situation to the following:
This gives me the following result:
Adding more children that are identical(ish) to the actual first sibling results in even more elements in the final array. Correct me if I’m wrong, but that shouldn’t be the case. In addition
:nth-child(1)
is not special, this also happens for other values of the pseudo-selector.I’m on Julia 1.5.3, which reports the following:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: