-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 60
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Force register a new schema #1877
Conversation
431c350
to
a931abb
Compare
if($scope.addSchema.remarks == null) { | ||
$scope.addSchema.remarks = " Force Register Schema option overriding schema compatibility has been selected." | ||
} else { | ||
$scope.addSchema.remarks += " Force Register Schema option overriding schema compatibility has been selected." |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
may be define the remarks in a var, and reuse in both the conditional blocks
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If it is set to += if they add remarks it will be added to the end.
but if they dont set a remark it will then come out as "undefined Force...."
so if block is needed to make sure remarks are not null to give best experience to user. Also copy may change Harishini is just checking on it at the mo i think.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I meant, if we can define a variable for the remarks string. Currently it is duplicated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
added!
…efault partition and replication numbers on a new topic request. Signed-off-by: Aindriu Lavelle <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mirjam Aulbach <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mirjam Aulbach <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mirjam Aulbach <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mirjam Aulbach <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mirjam Aulbach <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mirjam Aulbach <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mirjam Aulbach <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Aindriu Lavelle <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mirjam Aulbach <[email protected]>
c5ce243
to
53d4f5b
Compare
…enabled Signed-off-by: Aindriu Lavelle <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Aindriu Lavelle <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Aindriu Lavelle <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, thx
Signed-off-by: Mirjam Aulbach <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Force register a new schema also auto select the default partition and replication numbers on a new topic request.
Linked issue
Resolves: #1882
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
What is the current behavior?
Describe the state of the application before this PR. Illustrations appreciated (videos, gifs, screenshots).
What is the new behavior?
Describe the state of the application after this PR. Illustrations appreciated (videos, gifs, screenshots).
Other information
Additional changes, explanations of the approach taken, unresolved issues, necessary follow ups, etc.
Requirements (all must be checked before review)
main
branch have been pulledpnpm lint
has been run successfully