Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix/did peer generation #59

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Dec 18, 2024
Merged

Fix/did peer generation #59

merged 10 commits into from
Dec 18, 2024

Conversation

forkimenjeckayang
Copy link
Collaborator

@forkimenjeckayang forkimenjeckayang commented Dec 11, 2024

This PR adjusts the required chnages to have the did:peer:generator work for our use case, it intoduces

@Ogenbertrand
Copy link
Collaborator

Add tests for scenarios where invalid input is passed to generateKeyPairs, such as negative numbers or zero.

@hugoib
Copy link
Collaborator

hugoib commented Dec 14, 2024

It looks good! I added a comment that will be necessary to address so the did peers will be able to be used in further steps. (For packing the message, the id of the private key should have the previously shown format). Thank you!

@Ogenbertrand
Copy link
Collaborator

LGTM.

@Ogenbertrand
Copy link
Collaborator

It can be close after the response from @hugoib.

@forkimenjeckayang forkimenjeckayang merged commit d424198 into main Dec 18, 2024
2 checks passed
@forkimenjeckayang forkimenjeckayang deleted the fix/did-peer-generation branch December 18, 2024 11:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Fix did:peer generator
4 participants