Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make account-contract a flag in starknet-verify #198

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 25, 2022

Conversation

Nathan-SL
Copy link
Contributor

@Nathan-SL Nathan-SL commented Aug 25, 2022

Usage related changes

Development related changes

  • NA

Checklist:

  • Formatted the code
  • No linter errors + tried to avoid introducing linter warnings
  • Performed a self-review of the code
  • Rebased to the last commit of the target branch (or merged it into my branch)
  • Documented the changes
  • Updated the test directory (with a test case consisting of network.json, hardhat.config.ts, check.sh)
  • Linked issues which this PR resolves
  • Created a PR to the plugin branch of starknet-hardhat-example:
    • < EXAMPLE_REPO_PR_URL >
    • Modified test.sh to use my example repo branch
    • Restored test.sh to to use the original branch (after the example repo PR has been merged)
  • All tests are passing (for external contributors who don't have access to the CI/CD pipeline)

@Nathan-SL Nathan-SL requested a review from FabijanC August 25, 2022 08:31
@FabijanC FabijanC merged commit ff2cbd7 into release-0.7.0 Aug 25, 2022
@FabijanC FabijanC deleted the account-contract-flag branch August 25, 2022 11:41
FabijanC added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 2, 2022
* Make account-contract a flag in starknet-verify (#198)

* Calculate estimateFee Implicitly (#206)

* Change return type of function decodeEvents (#205)

Co-authored-by: Nathan <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Nathan-SL <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants