-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 116
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix bug where scalar phase was not conjugated by BaseGraph.adjoint() #230
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
2ee4390
Fix bug where scalar phase was not conjugated by BaseGraph.adjoint()
rafaelha fe06a7e
Multiply phase by -1 instead
rafaelha eea01a6
Add conjugate method to Scalar
c24e5ff
Use scalar conjugate in BaseGraph.copy
944a0b6
Add unittest for graph
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@ | ||
# PyZX - Python library for quantum circuit rewriting | ||
# and optimization using the ZX-calculus | ||
# Copyright (C) 2018 - Aleks Kissinger and John van de Wetering | ||
|
||
# Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); | ||
# you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. | ||
# You may obtain a copy of the License at | ||
|
||
# http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 | ||
|
||
# Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software | ||
# distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, | ||
# WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. | ||
# See the License for the specific language governing permissions and | ||
# limitations under the License. | ||
|
||
import unittest | ||
import sys | ||
import numpy as np | ||
from fractions import Fraction | ||
from pyzx.graph.scalar import Scalar | ||
|
||
if __name__ == '__main__': | ||
sys.path.append('..') | ||
sys.path.append('.') | ||
|
||
|
||
class TestScalar(unittest.TestCase): | ||
|
||
def test_initialization(self): | ||
scalar = Scalar() | ||
self.assertEqual(scalar.power2, 0) | ||
self.assertEqual(scalar.phase, Fraction(0)) | ||
self.assertEqual(scalar.phasenodes, []) | ||
self.assertEqual(scalar.floatfactor, 1.0) | ||
self.assertFalse(scalar.is_unknown) | ||
self.assertFalse(scalar.is_zero) | ||
|
||
def test_copy(self): | ||
scalar = Scalar() | ||
scalar.power2 = 2 | ||
scalar.phase = Fraction(1, 3) | ||
scalar.phasenodes = [Fraction(1, 2)] | ||
scalar.floatfactor = 2.0 | ||
copied_scalar = scalar.copy() | ||
self.assertEqual(copied_scalar.power2, 2) | ||
self.assertEqual(copied_scalar.phase, Fraction(1, 3)) | ||
self.assertEqual(copied_scalar.phasenodes, [Fraction(1, 2)]) | ||
self.assertEqual(copied_scalar.floatfactor, 2.0) | ||
self.assertFalse(copied_scalar.is_unknown) | ||
self.assertFalse(copied_scalar.is_zero) | ||
|
||
def test_conjugate(self): | ||
scalar = Scalar() | ||
scalar.phase = Fraction(1, 3) | ||
scalar.phasenodes = [Fraction(1, 2), Fraction(3, 4)] | ||
scalar.floatfactor = 2.0 + 1.0j | ||
|
||
conjugated_scalar = scalar.conjugate() | ||
self.assertEqual(conjugated_scalar.phase, -Fraction(1, 3)) | ||
self.assertEqual(conjugated_scalar.phasenodes, [-Fraction(1, 2), -Fraction(3, 4)]) | ||
self.assertEqual(conjugated_scalar.floatfactor, 2.0 - 1.0j) | ||
self.assertAlmostEqual(conjugated_scalar.to_number(), scalar.to_number().conjugate()) | ||
|
||
def test_to_number(self): | ||
scalar = Scalar() | ||
scalar.phase = Fraction(1, 4) | ||
scalar.phasenodes = [Fraction(1, 2)] | ||
scalar.floatfactor = 2.0 | ||
scalar.power2 = 2 | ||
number = scalar.to_number() | ||
expected_number = (np.exp(1j * np.pi * 0.25) * (1 + np.exp(1j * np.pi * 0.5)) * (2 ** 0.5) ** 2) * 2.0 | ||
self.assertAlmostEqual(number.real, expected_number.real, places=5) | ||
self.assertAlmostEqual(number.imag, expected_number.imag, places=5) | ||
|
||
|
||
if __name__ == '__main__': | ||
unittest.main() |
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Was this a debugging statement which was left in accidentally?
It causes the output of the test to look like this:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry, yes I left it accidentally. I saw that you already removed it, thanks!