Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Mar 25, 2019. It is now read-only.

Styling of SDSS icon is misleading #202

Open
alexbfree opened this issue Jun 19, 2015 · 8 comments
Open

Styling of SDSS icon is misleading #202

alexbfree opened this issue Jun 19, 2015 · 8 comments
Labels

Comments

@alexbfree
Copy link
Contributor

There are three equally sized and styled icons on the classify screen: SDSS, Favourite, and Invert. The right hand two are buttons that respond to a click, and the SDSS button does not. Presumably this is just providing information on the source of the image... as such it should be styled differently from the buttons that are actually clickable - OR, it should be clickable and send you somewhere when you click it (e.g. http://www.sdss.org/ )

@alexbfree alexbfree added the bug label Jun 19, 2015
@willettk
Copy link
Contributor

Yes - it changes based on the telescope used to classify the active data
set (SDSS, UKIRT, Hubble, etc). No objections to a moderate change; just
put a border or something around it? Should ask @heathv what might be best
...

On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 9:56 AM Alex Bowyer [email protected]
wrote:

There are three equally sized and styled icons on the classify screen:
SDSS, Favourite, and Invert. The right hand two are buttons that respond to
a click, and the SDSS button does not. Presumably this is just providing
information on the source of the image... as such it should be styled
differently from the buttons that are actually clickable - OR, it should be
clickable and send you somewhere when you click it (e.g.
http://www.sdss.org/ )


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#202.

@heathv
Copy link

heathv commented Jun 22, 2015

Looks like that icon is part of a sprite, one that has a green version of that icon. Easiest solution would be to use that one, but it may still look clickable. Otherwise I'd probably have to make a new icon.

@vrooje
Copy link

vrooje commented Jun 22, 2015

Could it be clickable (or mouseover with no delay, i.e. not just a Title
tag) with a pop-up that explains the SDSS in a sentence?

On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 3:18 PM, Heath V [email protected] wrote:

Looks like that icon is part of a sprite, one that has a green version of
that icon. Easiest solution would be to use that one, but it may still look
clickable. Otherwise I'd probably have to make a new icon.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#202 (comment)
.

@heathv
Copy link

heathv commented Jun 22, 2015

Yeah, a little mouseover tooltip could work.

@willettk
Copy link
Contributor

I'd vote for clickable rather than hovertext; I think users would get
mildly annoyed if it kept popping up as they moved around the screen.

On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 3:52 PM Heath V [email protected] wrote:

Yeah, a little tooltip could work.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#202 (comment)
.

@murraycu
Copy link
Contributor

If it's not clearly a link then the user might confuse it with an action button such as the Invert button. Then they would click it the first time, get taken to a separate web site, and lose their classification in progress. Not the end of the world, but not ideal.

@heathv
Copy link

heathv commented Jun 23, 2015

Another simple solution would be to remove the icon and add a line of text below the subject explain (very briefly) and linking to the SDSS.

image

@willettk
Copy link
Contributor

I'd be OK with either clickable text popping up (brief explanation +
hyperlink to SDSS site), or the text example above. @heathv and @alexbfree

  • what do you think is best from a design/UI perspective?

On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 2:37 PM Heath V [email protected] wrote:

Another simple solution would be to remove the icon and add a line of text
below the subject explain (very briefly) and linking to the SDSS.

[image: image]
https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/4551411/8307192/ec162032-1982-11e5-9df9-5ea9c8c57ea1.png


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#202 (comment)
.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants