Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
OGC Charter #23
OGC Charter #23
Changes from 9 commits
ba47de4
81a460e
866f3dc
2b1a33f
dafbe8e
8fc7e7f
1c9c286
e296f30
e3974c6
9a588b6
2564ee2
c3c8bea
94b41fb
ff091bb
b91ed5e
cadfcfc
5fafcf2
c0a316f
e62b316
c162329
e6840a1
de2711e
747a08f
dfe623e
ca90100
ee8ffdb
6006017
7e83fd4
9b0d97c
ed96db6
0897f0f
f473687
75acf3c
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The out of scope section should be much stronger to provide guidance for and focus the SWG activities.
Will dimensions of l model data (like ensemble) be in scope? I think the answer is no?
Will data access patterns for GeoZARR be part of the SWG activities or will this be strictly limited to a ZARR data package? i.e. will the conformance target be a zarr dataset standard or will there be other conformance targets like web data access? I see some stuff above that says that yes, access patterns are in scope, but would shy away from that being part of the normative spec and leave it as informative / guidance on how a person might use GeoZARR.
Perhaps some things called out from the discussion around visualization and symbology? Other things that should be out?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I disagree the charter should determine that. I also disagree about descoping those topics (which are covered in the original draft).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Some narrative about the relationship to the CF and ZARR communities could go here?