Set up userns in a straightforward way #2548
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: utam0k <[email protected]>
utam0k
added
the
kind/cleanup
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2548 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 65.91% 65.95% +0.03%
==========================================
Files 133 133
Lines 16872 16890 +18
==========================================
+ Hits 11122 11140 +18
Misses 5750 5750 |
YJDoc2
approved these changes
Nov 29, 2023
Signed-off-by: utam0k <[email protected]>
|
Thanks for your review 🙇 |
Signed-off-by: utam0k <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: utam0k <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: utam0k <[email protected]>
utam0k
force-pushed
the
refactor-userns
branch
from
441560d to
67685bb
Compare
This was referenced Dec 17, 2023
Merged
Merged
Closed
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It is just a functionalization. Easier to test.