Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Include all nodes in tree.toJSInfoForTest #832

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 30, 2024
Merged

Conversation

chacha912
Copy link
Contributor

@chacha912 chacha912 commented May 29, 2024

What this PR does / why we need it?

Modify tree.toJSInfoForTest to include all children nodes to display deleted nodes in devtools.

Any background context you want to provide?

What are the relevant tickets?

Fixes #

Checklist

  • Added relevant tests or not required
  • Didn't break anything

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved document structure handling by iterating over all child nodes, enhancing the accuracy of document representation.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented May 29, 2024

Walkthrough

The change in the CRDTTree class modifies the iteration logic by switching from node.children to node.allChildren. This adjustment impacts how nodeInfo.children is constructed, ensuring that all descendants are considered in the toTreeNodeInfo function, potentially altering the tree's structure representation.

Changes

File Path Summary
src/document/crdt/tree.ts Updated loop to iterate over node.allChildren instead of node.children during nodeInfo.children construction.

Poem

In the forest of code where data trees grow,
A change was made, so all children show.
From node.children to allChildren we went,
Ensuring each branch is properly sent.
Now the tree stands tall and grand,
With every node held hand in hand. 🌳✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
src/document/crdt/tree.ts (7)

Line range hint 151-151: Specify explicit types to avoid implicit 'any'.

Consider specifying explicit types for variables to enhance type safety and code maintainability.


Line range hint 154-154: Avoid non-null assertions.

Non-null assertions may lead to runtime errors if not handled properly. Consider adding necessary checks or refactor the code to ensure the objects are not null before accessing their properties.

Also applies to: 155-155, 160-160, 242-242, 547-547, 550-550, 591-591, 596-596, 890-890, 891-891, 896-896, 974-974, 1039-1039


Line range hint 326-328: Simplify control flow by removing unnecessary else clause.

- else {
-   return;
- }

Removing the unnecessary else clause simplifies the control flow and enhances code readability.


Line range hint 452-452: Avoid assignments within expressions.

Assignments within expressions can lead to unclear code. Consider separating the assignment from the expression for better readability and maintainability.


Line range hint 722-722: Use optional chaining for safer property access.

- if (node.parent && !node.parent.removedAt) {
+ if (node.parent?.removedAt) {

Using optional chaining (?.) ensures that the code does not throw if node.parent is undefined.


Line range hint 724-735: Prefer template literals over string concatenation.

- return '<' + node.type + attrs + '>' + node.children.map(toXML).join('') + '</' + node.type + '>';
+ return `<${node.type}${attrs}>${node.children.map(toXML).join('')}</${node.type}>`;

Using template literals improves readability and maintainability of the code by reducing complexity and potential errors in string concatenation.


Line range hint 877-877: Specify a type instead of using 'any'.

Using 'any' reduces the benefits of TypeScript's type system. Specify a more precise type to enhance code quality and error-checking capabilities.

Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c5e7e3a and 56c37a4.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/document/crdt/tree.ts (1 hunks)
Additional Context Used
Biome (20)
src/document/crdt/tree.ts (20)

151-151: This variable implicitly has the any type.


154-154: Forbidden non-null assertion.


155-155: Forbidden non-null assertion.


160-160: Forbidden non-null assertion.


242-242: Forbidden non-null assertion.


326-328: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early.


452-452: The assignment should not be in an expression.


547-547: Forbidden non-null assertion.


550-550: Forbidden non-null assertion.


591-591: Forbidden non-null assertion.


596-596: Forbidden non-null assertion.


722-722: Change to an optional chain.


724-735: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.


877-877: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.


890-890: Forbidden non-null assertion.


891-891: Forbidden non-null assertion.


891-891: Forbidden non-null assertion.


896-896: Forbidden non-null assertion.


974-974: Forbidden non-null assertion.


1039-1039: Forbidden non-null assertion.

Additional comments not posted (1)
src/document/crdt/tree.ts (1)

1359-1362: Ensure correct iteration over all children nodes.

The modification to iterate over node.allChildren instead of node.children ensures that all child nodes are included in the output, aligning with the PR's objective. This change should be reflected in the unit tests to verify the new behavior.

Copy link

codecov bot commented May 29, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 2 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 80.46%. Comparing base (c5e7e3a) to head (56c37a4).

Files Patch % Lines
src/document/crdt/tree.ts 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #832   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   80.46%   80.46%           
=======================================
  Files          59       59           
  Lines        4535     4535           
  Branches      918      918           
=======================================
  Hits         3649     3649           
  Misses        619      619           
  Partials      267      267           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@hackerwins hackerwins self-requested a review May 30, 2024 05:55
Copy link
Member

@hackerwins hackerwins left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for your contribution.

@hackerwins hackerwins changed the title Modify tree.toJSInfoForTest to include all children nodes Include all nodes in tree.toJSInfoForTest May 30, 2024
@hackerwins hackerwins merged commit bab2d82 into main May 30, 2024
2 checks passed
@hackerwins hackerwins deleted the tree-jsinfo-removed-node branch May 30, 2024 05:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants