-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 48
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
cifar10 code,loss remains unchanged #6
Comments
hello, did you succeed? |
hello, I gave up this.
…------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------
发件人: "yjwu17/STBP-for-training-SpikingNN" ***@***.***>;
发送时间: 2022年7月18日(星期一) 晚上10:03
***@***.***>;
***@***.******@***.***>;
主题: Re: [yjwu17/STBP-for-training-SpikingNN] cifar10 code,loss remains unchanged (Issue #6)
hello, did you succeed?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
I also found the same problem,but have solved it by setting firing threshold much lower(around 0.25).Probably this issue came from neurons' early death.So I am confused that whether 0.75 the best hyperparameter selection? |
@crashkk Hi, do you still remember the final acc for Cifar10? |
@QianpengLi577 hi, 70%-80% roughly,but with severe overfitting |
Thanks for your reply |
about the pytorch version for implementing cifar10 tasks ,sorry i don't know where the bug is,loss remains unchanged,low accuracy
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: