Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

XeAlias.java:95-97: Write test for the logic... #879

Closed
karato opened this issue Dec 17, 2015 · 20 comments
Closed

XeAlias.java:95-97: Write test for the logic... #879

karato opened this issue Dec 17, 2015 · 20 comments

Comments

@karato
Copy link
Collaborator

karato commented Dec 17, 2015

Puzzle 842-9eb73ef4 in netbout-web/src/main/java/com/netbout/rest/XeAlias.java:95-97 has to be resolved: Write test for the logic of generating Xembly for {@link Alias} class. It should focus on checking whether tags "email" and "newEmail" are properly populated based on input.... The puzzle was created by mkordas on 12-Dec-2015.

If you have any technical questions, don't ask me, submit new tickets instead

@karato
Copy link
Collaborator Author

karato commented Dec 17, 2015

@dmzaytsev there is no milestone yet, so I set it to 3.1

@karato karato added this to the 3.1 milestone Dec 17, 2015
@dmzaytsev
Copy link
Contributor

@yegor256 what does label D mean ?

@yegor256 yegor256 removed the D label Jan 11, 2016
@yegor256
Copy link
Owner

@dmzaytsev looks like a bug in Github... I removed it

@dmzaytsev
Copy link
Contributor

@yegor256 there is same label here #775

@karato karato added the D label Jan 11, 2016
@exper0
Copy link
Contributor

exper0 commented Jan 18, 2016

@karato @dmzaytsev what does D label means?

@dmzaytsev
Copy link
Contributor

@exper0 :)

@yegor256 what does label D mean ?
Owner
yegor256 commented 7 days ago
@dmzaytsev looks like a bug in Github... I removed it

@exper0
Copy link
Contributor

exper0 commented Jan 18, 2016

@dmzaytsev sorry, I missed it :)

@dmzaytsev
Copy link
Contributor

@karato assign @CarlosGines please

@karato
Copy link
Collaborator Author

karato commented Mar 7, 2016

@karato assign @CarlosGines please

@dmzaytsev OK @carlosgines please proceed, this task is yours

@wild-lotus
Copy link
Contributor

@dmzaytsev thank you :)

@wild-lotus
Copy link
Contributor

@karato please check PR #1079

@karato
Copy link
Collaborator Author

karato commented Mar 10, 2016

@karato please check PR #1079

@carlosgines thank you

wild-lotus pushed a commit to wild-lotus/netbout that referenced this issue Mar 10, 2016
wild-lotus pushed a commit to wild-lotus/netbout that referenced this issue Mar 12, 2016
wild-lotus pushed a commit to wild-lotus/netbout that referenced this issue Mar 14, 2016
wild-lotus pushed a commit to wild-lotus/netbout that referenced this issue Mar 14, 2016
wild-lotus pushed a commit to wild-lotus/netbout that referenced this issue Mar 14, 2016
@wild-lotus
Copy link
Contributor

@karato PR #1079 merged. Please close this ticket.

@wild-lotus
Copy link
Contributor

@karato please close this issue.

@karato
Copy link
Collaborator Author

karato commented Mar 16, 2016

@ypshenychka please, review this ticket for compliance with our QA rules

@ypshenychka
Copy link

@karato Quality is good.

@karato
Copy link
Collaborator Author

karato commented Mar 16, 2016

@karato Quality is good.

@ypshenychka thanks for the review

@karato
Copy link
Collaborator Author

karato commented Mar 16, 2016

@carlosgines paied 10 mins to @ypshenychka for QA review (payment ID is 80596220). Much appreciated! 30 mins was added to your account, payment ID AP-19E26381XW290394P, time spent is 182 hours and 56 mins. +30 to your rating, your total score is +180

@wild-lotus
Copy link
Contributor

@karato Thank you! Please do not forget to close the ticket so that I can get a new task assigned!

@karato karato closed this as completed Mar 16, 2016
@karato
Copy link
Collaborator Author

karato commented Mar 16, 2016

@dmzaytsev The issue is closed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants