chore: update package config

[vorel99]

In python world, new standard for package configuration is pyproject.toml. So I moved all static config from setup.py to pyproject.toml.

• move all static package setup from setup.py to pyproject.toml
• remove all requirements files
• update gitlab actions
  • replace all requirements files usage

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 75.00000% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 89.53%. Comparing base (3d4e482) to head (8632412).
Report is 76 commits behind head on develop.

❗ Current head 8632412 differs from pull request most recent head d53bbe7

Please upload reports for the commit d53bbe7 to get more accurate results.

Files	Patch %	Lines
setup.py	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #1448      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    90.01%   89.53%   -0.48%     
===========================================
  Files          194      194              
  Lines         6368     6316      -52     
===========================================
- Hits          5732     5655      -77     
- Misses         636      661      +25     

Flag	Coverage Δ
py3.8-ubuntu-22.04-pandas	89.53% <75.00%> (-0.48%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[fabclmnt]

Hi @vorel99 ,

once again than you for your contribution :)

I've already requested the review from the team!

[vascoalramos]

Hi @vorel99.

Thank you for your work in the migration to pyproject.toml.
I left some change requests mostly related to the makefile and dependency options.
The primary reason for most of the requests relates to keeping consistency between all of our open-source projects.

[vascoalramos]

Everything else seems fine to me. @portellaa, what do you think?

[vorel99]

hello,
@vascoalramos @portellaa what is the status of MR? Is there any blocker to be resolved?

[portellaa]

Hi @vorel99

Thanks for your PR.

Unfortunately we don't have the time right now to move forward with this, we kindly ask you to give us some more time.
Given the amount of the changes, it breaks some internal alignments that we will need to work with you, but right now we can't focus on this.

Sorry for this.
We will get in touch as soon as we can pick this.

Cheers

[vorel99]

Thanks for reply @portellaa,
there wasn't that many of changes (its probably result of force-push from aquemy).
Changes were just in 15 files with 189 additions and 171 deletions.
There is an example of pull request, what it looked like when it was created and vascoalramos did review.
vorel99#78

I can rebase my branch to new develop, when you are ready.

Regards,
JC

[vorel99]

Hello @fabclmnt,
would it be possible to reassign reviewers? The pull request was inactive for almost a year due to waiting for a message from one of current reviewers.

Thank you,
JC

[fabclmnt]

Hi @vorel99,

just reviewed the PR. The changes seem to be aligned!

There are a few conflicting issues that need to be sorted so we can proceed with merge.

[vorel99]

Hi @fabclmnt ,
I rebased feature branch to develop.
PR is ready for merge