Use correct BUILD_FILTER_BUILDS filter for build namespace

[jbliznak]

I noticed this mismatch where all other save* calls differentiate filters for master and build namespace and only this one doesn't which is a bug introduced during refactoring and introducing this new saveBuildLogs method.

[jbliznak]

BTW this fix is preventing the error I am seeing complaining about a build that isn't there for days (don't ask me why, it is a simple fix for complex problem but it has to have something to do with example and example-build name mismatch)

[2022-12-06 01:14:57,454] ERROR- Throwable: 
io.fabric8.kubernetes.client.KubernetesClientException: Failure executing: GET at: https://api.cluster-url:6443/apis/build.openshift.io/v1/namespaces/jbliznak-xtf/builds/example/log?pretty=false. Message: pod "example-build" not found. Received status: Status(apiVersion=v1, code=400, details=null, kind=Status, message=pod "example-build" not found, metadata=ListMeta(_continue=null, remainingItemCount=null, resourceVersion=null, selfLink=null, additionalProperties={}), reason=BadRequest, status=Failure, additionalProperties={}).
	at io.fabric8.kubernetes.client.dsl.base.OperationSupport.requestFailure(OperationSupport.java:682)
	at io.fabric8.kubernetes.client.dsl.base.OperationSupport.requestFailure(OperationSupport.java:661)
	at io.fabric8.kubernetes.client.dsl.base.OperationSupport.assertResponseCode(OperationSupport.java:612)
	at io.fabric8.kubernetes.client.dsl.base.OperationSupport.handleRawGet(OperationSupport.java:469)
	at io.fabric8.openshift.client.dsl.internal.build.BuildOperationsImpl.doGetLog(BuildOperationsImpl.java:127)
	at io.fabric8.openshift.client.dsl.internal.build.BuildOperationsImpl.getLog(BuildOperationsImpl.java:135)
	at cz.xtf.core.openshift.OpenShift.getBuildLog(OpenShift.java:827)
	at cz.xtf.core.openshift.OpenShift.storeBuildLog(OpenShift.java:1358)
	at cz.xtf.junit5.extensions.OpenShiftRecorderService.lambda$null$4(OpenShiftRecorderService.java:510)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.ForEachOps$ForEachOp$OfRef.accept(ForEachOps.java:183)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline$2$1.accept(ReferencePipeline.java:177)
	at java.base/java.util.ArrayList$ArrayListSpliterator.forEachRemaining(ArrayList.java:1655)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.copyInto(AbstractPipeline.java:484)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.wrapAndCopyInto(AbstractPipeline.java:474)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.ForEachOps$ForEachOp.evaluateSequential(ForEachOps.java:150)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.ForEachOps$ForEachOp$OfRef.evaluateSequential(ForEachOps.java:173)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.evaluate(AbstractPipeline.java:234)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline.forEach(ReferencePipeline.java:497)
	at cz.xtf.junit5.extensions.OpenShiftRecorderService.lambda$saveBuildLogs$5(OpenShiftRecorderService.java:508)
	at cz.xtf.junit5.extensions.OpenShiftRecorderService.saveBuildLogs(OpenShiftRecorderService.java:521)
	at cz.xtf.junit5.extensions.OpenShiftRecorderService.recordState(OpenShiftRecorderService.java:213)
	at cz.xtf.junit5.extensions.OpenShiftRecorderHandler.handleTestExecutionException(OpenShiftRecorderHandler.java:63)

[mnovak]

Nice catch! Merged.