-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 105
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ValueObject
interface for KMolecules
#100
Comments
I created a PR for this issue as I just stumbled upon this as well. @NathanCAllen You don't need write access to a repository to create a PR, you can fork the repository, push your changes on a branch and then open up a PR in the original repository. |
Added missing license header. Simplify SimpleAssociation.equals(…).
That's merged, thanks! |
Possible to get a release containing this fix quickly? I'm unfortunately unable to pull external snapshot dependencies. |
Kotlin? Have you switched to the dark side, Matt? 😜 I can wrap up a release tomorrow (Friday). |
Kotlin is the dark side? 😂 At first glance I thought you were teasing me about my snapshots policy. At any rate, I've been writing pretty much 100% Kotlin since mid-2020. Oops. Also, thanks! I've been following JMolecules from afar for awhile, but I'm finally getting a chance to use it! |
No package scope -> dark side. A hill I am wiling to die on. 😬 |
You're not wrong. I don't like it either. But cost/benefit to me has worked out pretty well. |
Since #51 was implemented before #55,
ValueObject
was never added as an interface in KMolecules.I'd create the PR for this myself, but I don't have write access to the repo.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: