You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The claimed improvement from actionness regression does not seem to materialize based on my implementation using this code repository. The results with and without actionness regression are very similar.
Upon inspecting the implementation, I noticed a potential issue:
On line 315, all target segments in the batch are concatenated, and on line 323 the maximum IoU between a predicted segment and all target segments is taken as the actionness ground truth. However, the IoUs are computed across videos, likely producing a maximum IoU between a predicted segment in video A and a ground truth segment in video B.
Even after correcting this issue, there was still no performance improvement from the actionness regression in my runs (the performance drops a lot actually). Upon my inspection, that because the actionness regression suffers from a serious label imbalance problem as most target IoUs are zero.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
makecent
added a commit
to makecent/DITA
that referenced
this issue
Jul 1, 2023
1. We only totally abandoned the Actionness Regression and delete all related functions and files. See this issue for details:xlliu7/TadTR#28
3. Reformat/clean code space.
The claimed improvement from actionness regression does not seem to materialize based on my implementation using this code repository. The results with and without actionness regression are very similar.
Upon inspecting the implementation, I noticed a potential issue:
TadTR/models/tadtr.py
Lines 314 to 325 in 983ae14
On line 315, all target segments in the batch are concatenated, and on line 323 the maximum IoU between a predicted segment and all target segments is taken as the actionness ground truth. However, the IoUs are computed across videos, likely producing a maximum IoU between a predicted segment in video A and a ground truth segment in video B.
Even after correcting this issue, there was still no performance improvement from the actionness regression in my runs (the performance drops a lot actually). Upon my inspection, that because the actionness regression suffers from a serious label imbalance problem as most target IoUs are zero.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: