Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WIP] Airspec launcher #685

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

xerial
Copy link
Member

@xerial xerial commented Sep 9, 2019

Create a standalone launcher for AirSpec

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 9, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #685 into master will decrease coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is 66.66%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #685      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   83.24%   83.24%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         230      231       +1     
  Lines        8754     8753       -1     
  Branches      636      646      +10     
==========================================
- Hits         7287     7286       -1     
  Misses       1467     1467
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
airspec/src/main/scala/wvlet/airspec/AirSpec.scala 93.33% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
.../main/scala/wvlet/airspec/runner/AirSpecTask.scala 100% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
...scala/wvlet/airspec/runner/AirSpecTaskRunner.scala 85.45% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
airspec/src/main/scala/wvlet/airspec/package.scala 100% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
...ain/scala/wvlet/airspec/runner/AirSpecLogger.scala 73.33% <ø> (+1.45%) ⬆️
...pec/src/main/scala/wvlet/airspec/AirSpecMain.scala 0% <0%> (ø)
.../scala/wvlet/airspec/runner/AirSpecRunnerSbt.scala 62.5% <100%> (ø)
...rspec/src/main/scala/wvlet/airspec/Framework.scala 80% <100%> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 9434e6b...c666f34. Read the comment docs.

@xerial xerial mentioned this pull request Sep 9, 2019
14 tasks
@xerial xerial mentioned this pull request Dec 5, 2019
76 tasks
@xerial
Copy link
Member Author

xerial commented Jan 2, 2020

We need to redo this work as we added new test syntax #876

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant