-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 275
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bump libcap epoch #11056
Bump libcap epoch #11056
Conversation
This hasn't been rebuilt in a while but the provides are broken. Signed-off-by: Jon Johnson <[email protected]>
@jonjohnsonjr I don't know enough about apk to know whether this change is causing the issue I'm seeing, or will fix it after some kind of propagation, but starting sometime within the last 8 hours or so building the following dockerfile began to fail with the same error you posted:
|
temporarily reverting this as it caused so conflicts: #11099 |
@russellhaering with the updated package temporarily withdraw, please let me know if the issue you're seeing persists. we'll get |
I'm still seeing the same issue, but as a workaround I tried to debug a little bit, if it helps it appears to me that the withdraw didn't work, or maybe hasn't been fully published yet. Specifically, if you run this (or pull and inspect the index without the horrible bash one-liner):
You'll see:
Which implies to me that libcap-2.69-r1 is still in the index for some reason. I do see this workflow run which at a glance looks like it should have removed it from the index though. The workaround above is good enough for me, but also happy to help debug however I can. |
libcap build is making a circular dependency.
but
and after
|
I'm not sure why, but i believe i found it's happens. In build logs libcap.so.2.69 and libpsx.so.2.69 have an program interpreter, it makes that no enter in this melange block and not generate provides information right. Besides, I think that we maybe make some confusion with libcap in libc condition
More context Last Maybe @kaniini could help us with this |
The issue is tracked here on melange chainguard-dev/melange#920 |
This hasn't been rebuilt in a while but the provides are broken.