Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Correct kyber levels. Was copy and paste error. #8084

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 16, 2024

Conversation

anhu
Copy link
Member

@anhu anhu commented Oct 16, 2024

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

@douzzer douzzer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

PRB-liboqs.txt_0 isn't getting along with the changes:

Testing configuration:
--with-liboqs --enable-experimental  --enable-opensslextra
Testing DEFAULT: --with-liboqs --enable-experimental  --enable-opensslextra
Configure RESULT = 0
make[2]: warning: -j3 forced in submake: resetting jobserver mode.
src/ssl.c:21837:66: error: ‘WOLFSSL_P256_KYBER_LEVEL3’ undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean ‘WOLFSSL_P256_KYBER_LEVEL1’?
21837 |     {CURVE_NAME("P384_KYBER_LEVEL3"), WOLFSSL_P384_KYBER_LEVEL3, WOLFSSL_P256_KYBER_LEVEL3},
      |                                                                  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      |                                                                  WOLFSSL_P256_KYBER_LEVEL1
src/ssl.c:21837:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘curve’ of ‘WOLF_EC_NIST_NAME’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
21837 |     {CURVE_NAME("P384_KYBER_LEVEL3"), WOLFSSL_P384_KYBER_LEVEL3, WOLFSSL_P256_KYBER_LEVEL3},
      |     ^
In file included from src/ssl.c:[36](https://cloud.wolfssl-test.com/jenkins/job/PRB-generic-config-parser/6175/pipeline-console/?start-byte=0&selected-node=1063#log-36):
./wolfssl/internal.h:6398:12: note: ‘curve’ declared here
 6398 |     word16 curve;
      |            ^~~~~
src/ssl.c:21838:66: error: ‘WOLFSSL_P256_KYBER_LEVEL5’ undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean ‘WOLFSSL_P256_KYBER_LEVEL1’?
218[38](https://cloud.wolfssl-test.com/jenkins/job/PRB-generic-config-parser/6175/pipeline-console/?start-byte=0&selected-node=1063#log-38) |     {CURVE_NAME("P521_KYBER_LEVEL5"), WOLFSSL_P521_KYBER_LEVEL5, WOLFSSL_P256_KYBER_LEVEL5},
      |                                                                  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      |                                                                  WOLFSSL_P256_KYBER_LEVEL1
src/ssl.c:21838:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘curve’ of ‘WOLF_EC_NIST_NAME’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
21838 |     {CURVE_NAME("P521_KYBER_LEVEL5"), WOLFSSL_P521_KYBER_LEVEL5, WOLFSSL_P256_KYBER_LEVEL5},
      |     ^
In file included from src/ssl.c:36:
./wolfssl/internal.h:6[39](https://cloud.wolfssl-test.com/jenkins/job/PRB-generic-config-parser/6175/pipeline-console/?start-byte=0&selected-node=1063#log-39)8:12: note: ‘curve’ declared here
 6398 |     word16 curve;
      |            ^~~~~

@douzzer douzzer assigned anhu and unassigned wolfSSL-Bot Oct 16, 2024
@douzzer
Copy link
Contributor

douzzer commented Oct 16, 2024

retest this please

@anhu anhu assigned wolfSSL-Bot and unassigned anhu Oct 16, 2024
@douzzer douzzer merged commit a833d6e into wolfSSL:master Oct 16, 2024
140 checks passed
kp-max-li added a commit to expressvpn/wolfssl-rs that referenced this pull request Oct 28, 2024
Moving from v5.7.2-stable
We are picking up:
https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl/releases/tag/v5.7.4-stable

Updated to implement an important bugfix:
wolfSSL/wolfssl#8084
kp-thomas-yau pushed a commit to expressvpn/wolfssl-rs that referenced this pull request Oct 29, 2024
Moving from v5.7.2-stable
We are picking up:
https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl/releases/tag/v5.7.4-stable

Updated to implement an important bugfix:
wolfSSL/wolfssl#8084
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants