Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Establish initial list of centre-id values #5

Closed
tomkralidis opened this issue Aug 25, 2022 · 9 comments
Closed

Establish initial list of centre-id values #5

tomkralidis opened this issue Aug 25, 2022 · 9 comments

Comments

@tomkralidis
Copy link
Collaborator

We need an initial list of centre-id's to be able to properly classify and identify data.

cc @efucile @golfvert

@efucile
Copy link
Member

efucile commented Aug 25, 2022

The center-id should identify the WIS2 node originator of the data. I think we should define a registration process for the WIS2 nodes and one step will be the choice of center-id. I think we should start with the centers contributing to the pilot phase. I am not for defining a list of phantom center-ids.

@golfvert
Copy link
Contributor

+1 with Enrico. Something to discuss in an upcoming W2AT meeting, I guees!

@tomkralidis
Copy link
Collaborator Author

This was brought up earlier today during wis2box discussions on validating topic hierarchy.

This should be covered in the context of the WIS2 registry WP (process, guidance on defining, etc.).

@golfvert
Copy link
Contributor

Before making it worldwide (and potentially difficult to manage) let's make it tailored for the pilot phase. We have 20ish names to agree.
I'll take meteo-france 😄 and fra. No surprise here!!
What is important here is lowercase only and no diacritics symbols. So no Météo-France!!

@golfvert
Copy link
Contributor

Shall we, for the time being, just have a shared excel file somewhere with country and centre_id?

@efucile
Copy link
Member

efucile commented Dec 15, 2022

better to have a csv file on github, at least version control is ensured

@golfvert
Copy link
Contributor

OK. Almost the same thing :)

@amilan17
Copy link
Member

related to issue #21

@tomkralidis
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Closing given we will add as needed during pilot phase. Governance workflow to be continued in #21.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants